From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1dn3ki-0008Cf-NV for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:13:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn3kc-00089W-5h for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:13:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn3kW-0003hy-8P for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:13:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn3kP-0003gZ-Hz; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:13:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD357F755; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:13:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5FD357F755 Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com Received: from gondolin (dhcp-192-215.str.redhat.com [10.33.192.215]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8617387F86; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:13:27 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier , Philippe =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldS1EYXVkw6k=?= , =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6k=?= Lureau , David Gibson Message-ID: <20170830161327.4b199e9a.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1504100343-26607-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> References: <1504100343-26607-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:13:36 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.11] hw/misc/ivshmem: Fix ivshmem_recv_msg() to also work on big endian systems X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:13:56 -0000 On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:39:03 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > The "slow" ivshmem-tests currently fail when they are running on a > big endian host: > > $ uname -m > ppc64 > $ V=1 QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 tests/ivshmem-test -m slow > /x86_64/ivshmem/single: OK > /x86_64/ivshmem/hotplug: OK > /x86_64/ivshmem/memdev: OK > /x86_64/ivshmem/pair: OK > /x86_64/ivshmem/server-msi: qemu-system-x86_64: > -device ivshmem-doorbell,chardev=chr0,vectors=2: server sent invalid ID message > Broken pipe > > The problem is that the server side code in ivshmem_server_send_one_msg() > correctly translates all messages IDs into little endian 64-bit values, > but the client side code in the ivshmem_recv_msg() function does not swap > the byte order back. Fix it by passing the value through le64_to_cpu(). > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > --- > hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c > index 47a015f..b3ef3ec 100644 > --- a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c > +++ b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c > @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static int64_t ivshmem_recv_msg(IVShmemState *s, int *pfd, Error **errp) > } while (n < sizeof(msg)); > > *pfd = qemu_chr_fe_get_msgfd(&s->server_chr); > - return msg; > + return le64_to_cpu(msg); > } > > static void ivshmem_recv_setup(IVShmemState *s, Error **errp) This fixes the "invalid ID message" problem on s390x for me as well, and I run now into the same error as on x86 (which you also have a fix for IIRC), so I guess this is Tested-by: Cornelia Huck