From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1eCA8x-0001gY-Ty for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 15:06:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCA8v-0001f6-AA for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 15:06:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCA8u-00034h-EX for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 15:06:41 -0500 Received: from jessie.kos.to ([212.47.231.226]:58024 helo=pilvi.kos.to) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCA8q-000336-23; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 15:06:36 -0500 Received: from kos.to (jessie.kos.to [212.47.231.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pilvi.kos.to (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FDC52C19A4; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 27933 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:06:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:06:34 +0000 From: Riku Voipio To: Zach Riggle Cc: Peter Maydell , Eric Blake , QEMU Trivial , Laurent Vivier , "open list:All patches CC here" Message-ID: <20171107200634.GB27631@kos.to> References: <20171024230758.31779-1-riggle@google.com> <20171025033442.44872-1-zachriggle@gmail.com> <20171027093600.GA29513@kos.to> <2251f54e-4c55-7495-8f60-af40cdd80594@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.47.231.226 Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: fix is_proc_myself to check the paths via realpath X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 20:06:42 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:17:44PM +0000, Zach Riggle wrote: > Ping! What needs to be done to move this forward? My current implementation > is compatible with musl. I'll have a look at it soon. Riku > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:36 PM Peter Maydell > wrote: > > > On 28 October 2017 at 06:14, Eric Blake wrote: > > > By definition, in linux-user, we ARE using glibc; therefore, you are > > > free to use all GNU extensions. > > > > Don't we also support musl libc? I forget... > > > > thanks > > -- PMM > >