From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1SwTlh-0001aN-Pa for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:54:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwTlZ-0001E0-6D for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:54:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwTlY-0006kJ-A6 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:54:49 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39615 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwTlQ-0006jJ-Ez; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:54:40 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BBB9FB23; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5018E0BE.3000706@suse.de> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:54:38 +0200 From: Hannes Reinecke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paolo Bonzini References: <1343714097-545-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> <5017EE1D.8060908@suse.de> <5017EEFD.5070503@redhat.com> <5017EFC6.1050705@suse.de> <5017F0A2.5030400@redhat.com> <5017F1E3.90806@suse.de> <87y5m06jx1.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <5017FD81.3040707@redhat.com> <50185960.9050700@suse.de> <5018DCEB.9060208@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5018DCEB.9060208@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Received-From: 195.135.220.15 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Stefan Weil , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] megasas: Update function megasys_scsi_uninit X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 07:54:56 -0000 On 08/01/2012 09:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 01/08/2012 00:17, Hannes Reinecke ha scritto: >> Ad 2: no, the SAS address for the devices is _not_ the WWN. >> The WWN is the ID of the LUN, whereas the SAS address is the ID of the >> Target. So to be correct we would need to generate unique SAS addresse= d >> per target which needs to be different from the WWN. >=20 > Oh, that's even easier then, just delete all the get_wwn stuff and use > HBA address + 1 + sdev->id. >=20 Which HBA address? You that one I wasn't supposed to use ? :-) As said, I'm currently working on a patch. But yeah, that's essentially what I'll be doing. Stay tuned. Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=C3=B6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=C3=BCrnberg)