From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Undefine _FORTIFY_SOURCE prior using it
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:09:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51127222.1040904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130206144956.GA22233@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
Il 06/02/2013 15:49, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>> > I don't think that's necessary. The 2nd level is the highest one [1] or [2].
>> > It seems like in my case it's compiler who's defining the macro:
>> >
>> > $ echo "int main() {return 0;}" | gcc -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -x c -
>> > <command-line>:0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by default]
>> > <stdin>:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>> >
>> > in which case we must undefine it. However, if the _FORTIFY_SOURCE is
>> > defined by environment, I think we should not override it. So maybe need
>> > a different approach. Anyway, with current state I cannot compile. I am using
>> > gcc version 4.7.2 (Gentoo 4.7.2 p1.3, pie-0.5.5)
> It would be nice to fix this for QEMU 1.4 but my gcc FORTIFY_SOURCE foo
> is not strong enough to know what the best approach is here.
>
> Reviews from anyone else?
I would prefer to avoid having _FORTIFY_SOURCE completely, and let
distros do it. Alternatively, tie it to a new --enable switch which
would do -U -D.
But if there is a real problem for 1.4 the patch looks good.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-06 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 10:15 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] configure: Undefine _FORTIFY_SOURCE prior using it Michal Privoznik
2013-02-01 9:54 ` [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] " Andreas Färber
2013-02-01 15:18 ` Michal Privoznik
2013-02-06 14:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-02-06 15:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-04-23 17:18 ` Michal Privoznik
2013-04-24 10:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-02-06 17:05 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51127222.1040904@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=mprivozn@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).