From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1aPnbm-00042b-MO for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 03:43:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPnbk-000424-Jl for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 03:43:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPnbh-0003DO-Db for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 03:43:44 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:36198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aPnbh-0003Cq-7h for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 03:43:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id p63so31250193wmp.1 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:43:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bIRLwkhS7JSqA0Hv74K/40WKU3mu5YL3quSFAIKITe0=; b=elFrMusHvbNBnZ5mxtadU5VlRiIYaULgW2F7si/G+c5byjm4PXQTg4pbwQF5OwfMue 5DqiyR/AkwD6sDpg3dpSOiy+opIKJ6eDmlSvlJLhWd89hz3JEFIpwb8AxRsd2gSm/Ah1 K6Ya8C9rWL+BhuuNhBQGKinlmZc9cLgTBK+MY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bIRLwkhS7JSqA0Hv74K/40WKU3mu5YL3quSFAIKITe0=; b=hHo2NZITzJO83br3HLYuA/JZIG7g773M/90KSJMbP3CxJpYZoVMXVqSoH+z4XLvFcc scHjaJvaI7BPRrI8NELFZrnsgcxJ5h0ltYiiBe/5VZyKUSK/CIhY7RULshHtMvFvuq8o tsxzQ4ILtmY/N9zZI/7/jy/DVnMij/sNAb90xg/zoJpJPux26+D0Wz0q56rUnoHovoxa B1Q1asjM6JHy9tk7v2lzh1RzK4ioyNPYf0s466a36aE1qXj8w9viwOqrfunwBhkqKu6S yuTY/5kZZFlyoMl9tqeA9gjg7weO1AvFJxaJizgbjt6ErNA8jWhQBL/l1oK4QwYA+0Xx 0FHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSARxA7lR56lY+PpGrStrGt3nlUl5UtXzHVINFf2tVN3vMQyfooBJ0N3MpuRMq4H9Yf X-Received: by 10.28.179.84 with SMTP id c81mr5998648wmf.30.1454229820170; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen.linaro.local ([81.128.185.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u69sm5873931wmu.20.2016.01.31.00.43.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:43:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaro.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060063E013A; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:43:38 +0000 (GMT) References: <1453991009-32736-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <56AC86FF.2050806@msgid.tls.msk.ru> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.0.50.9 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Michael Tokarev In-reply-to: <56AC86FF.2050806@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:43:37 +0000 Message-ID: <877fiqyw92.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::236 Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Peter Maydell , qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v3 0/3] Travis updates X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:43:45 -0000 Michael Tokarev writes: > 28.01.2016 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The first patch has been reviewed and signed off. Long term I think >> it is worth applying but it look like the performance increase it >> negligible compared to the old style VM builds at the moment. I >> suspect this may be because the new infrastructure is under more load >> as more projects have migrated. > > I'm applying all this to -trivial, but without trying to understand > what it is all about, as I don't know travis. Maybe we should hold off for now until the later ones have been reviewed (David has some comments on 2/3). I guess it was really a question of if trivial is the right tree for these patches to go upstream. Maybe what's really needed is a build and test automation tree (and associated maintainer)? Peter any comments? > > Thanks, > > /mjt -- Alex Bennée