From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1da1ND-0003zP-Lg for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:03:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da1NA-0003vr-DP for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:03:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da1N6-0003Tg-Fn for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:03:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]:35963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da1N6-0003T7-9z for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:03:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y43so120271328wrd.3 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:03:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=18+x72kwgz1NMJs6pGFLcV9TX3Hy9WZ+0BE1Y+kOz8g=; b=OvPxHqyRKh6d3ZwwnalFWSBFxjNcdE10Yh0VxIv4dwUBLuG3FIuRptzTT8TQIwOhwU 7Z7w7Rj/bpdNNqqFUfPEaBrzityw0zL4q/MejUhwyfhpCD/qaCOENq6EhOBaErkKEREZ bKuvYcLcNwXJHwnwsBRZ1D8/VNFk9nnElDUS0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=18+x72kwgz1NMJs6pGFLcV9TX3Hy9WZ+0BE1Y+kOz8g=; b=kA/kwykDTvWLAbvvEx4kBn7p3iWZvAUnu02oWNE6PGbKtrCkyrX30fdSkWqZSSCcjp LQ0QbIfiYz+Dh8EMQJeUfg6+Wb3mi0ZyjUECCjSYc8f3vmWLVbmkrGvHvtITvmdbUD/x jVu0AnSVQCV4YDFR11lpG44XmY8X3KDqieAwIC5tPmClTzuUAHrAdzo10GJkn+YGWDfV Y6ofZBqILtRiOH7Q1q+7TazOEpGeyozbCWCrQscB6MbJZKG5y0qMJLqlfW3ih2GrzuiS /ihGLFawno7QWvU2AsPYCtscJ3Iir0ywXQ5TLuzEDccJrDsrvdy6znQINP4+dGk1AK2N Q+tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110qHNV7L7k0O7iHR+eY6C9zzGW0TQgJiPBy1lK7N+m/GYu4w4jI 72hu33CuMoSG21SZ X-Received: by 10.223.129.245 with SMTP id 108mr19740810wra.67.1500995018993; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaro.local ([81.128.185.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i32sm33026263wra.5.2017.07.25.08.03.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaro.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 253733E0085; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:03:37 +0100 (BST) References: <20170724182751.18261-1-f4bug@amsat.org> <20170724182751.18261-36-f4bug@amsat.org> <87lgncehbq.fsf@linaro.org> <5effed07-96c1-ae79-32a5-46b75516bf21@amsat.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.2.50.3 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Cc: Eric Blake , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org In-reply-to: <5effed07-96c1-ae79-32a5-46b75516bf21@amsat.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:03:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87eft4eeye.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [RFC PATCH for 2.10 35/35] script to run docker image X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:03:45 -0000 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes: >> This isn't appropriate for 2.10 now we are feature frozen. That said I > > Surely. From the cover: > > "... provided at the end of this series as RFC for people wanted > to give a try (also include 'dockershell' script and a fix in > ./configure). These RFC patches (33-35) are not expected to enter > 2.10." My mistake - I hadn't gone over the cover letter. I would usually expect a series with [PATCH for 2.10] just to contain stuff being considered for the immediate future. > > Peter also commented on the "./configure" patch, so I probably > mis-titled "RFC" those patch > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg07584.html: > "I prefixed this patch 'RFC' to not consider it but provide it > if someone wanted to reproduce the analysis. Maybe I should prefix it > 'XXX' next time or 'NOT FOR MERGE'." > > better "NOT FOR REVIEW" or "!RFC"? :p Better to post a logically separate series. It's fine to make an in-flight series a pre-requisite though (not that I think you need it here). >> have pondered a helper script for this sort of thing before. As it stand >> I just rely on my shell to remember the correct invocation for me. >> >> This is the sort of functionality we would need for maybe cross >> compiling tests using docker. > > This script is way incomplete and far being finished. > > Regards, > > Phil. -- Alex Bennée