From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1T482Z-0006L0-Es for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:19:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50247) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T482W-0006Dc-Ca for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:19:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T482V-0007UH-LQ for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:19:56 -0400 Received: from mono.eik.bme.hu ([152.66.115.2]:58401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T482T-0007Tm-E9; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:19:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mono.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D74283; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:19:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eik.bme.hu Received: from mono.eik.bme.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mono.eik.bme.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7K9atN3cRIyb; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:19:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mono.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id 67FAA91F; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:19:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:19:52 +0200 (CEST) From: BALATON Zoltan X-X-Sender: balaton@mono To: Jan Kiszka In-Reply-To: <5034926B.5020808@web.de> Message-ID: References: <5034926B.5020808@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 152.66.115.2 Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] vmware_vga: Cleanup and allow simple drivers to work without the fifo X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:19:57 -0000 On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: > This is a rather big patch. I strongly suspect you can break it up into > smaller pieces that address separate aspects one-by-one. Also, it is > definitely to heavy for "qemu-trivial". Despite its size the changes included are fairly simple but I can try to break it up. I've sent it to qemu-trivial because it may meet the "Do not fall under an actively maintained subsystem." category as I've found no maintainer for this part. Should I send the revisions only to qemu-devel then? Thanks, BALATON Zoltan