From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/12] rcu: Inline invoke_rcu_callbacks() into its sole remaining caller
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 07:52:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190530145229.29565-6-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190530145204.GA28526@linux.ibm.com>
This commit saves a few lines of code by inlining invoke_rcu_callbacks()
into its sole remaining caller.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 20 +++-----------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 8e290163505a..7822a2e1370d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ static void rcu_init_new_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf);
static void rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf);
static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu);
static void invoke_rcu_core(void);
-static void invoke_rcu_callbacks(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void rcu_report_exp_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp);
static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu);
@@ -2296,8 +2295,9 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
rcu_check_gp_start_stall(rnp, rdp, rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check());
/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
- if (rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
- invoke_rcu_callbacks(rdp);
+ if (rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
+ likely(READ_ONCE(rcu_scheduler_fully_active)))
+ rcu_do_batch(rdp);
/* Do any needed deferred wakeups of rcuo kthreads. */
do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(rdp);
@@ -2332,20 +2332,6 @@ static void invoke_rcu_core_kthread(void)
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
-/*
- * Do RCU callback invocation. Not that if we are running !use_softirq,
- * we are already in the rcuc kthread. If callbacks are offloaded, then
- * ->cblist is always empty, so we don't get here. Therefore, we only
- * ever need to check for the scheduler being operational (some callbacks
- * do wakeups, so we do need the scheduler).
- */
-static void invoke_rcu_callbacks(struct rcu_data *rdp)
-{
- if (unlikely(!READ_ONCE(rcu_scheduler_fully_active)))
- return;
- rcu_do_batch(rdp);
-}
-
/*
* Wake up this CPU's rcuc kthread to do RCU core processing.
*/
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-30 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-30 14:52 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/12] Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/12] rcu: Enable elimination of Tree-RCU softirq processing Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/12] rcu: Check for wakeup-safe conditions in rcu_read_unlock_special() Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: Only do rcu_read_unlock_special() wakeups if expedited Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: Allow rcu_read_unlock_special() to raise_softirq() if in_irq() Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: Use irq_work to get scheduler's attention in clean context Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: Avoid self-IPI in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus() Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Avoid self-IPI in sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup() Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/12] lockdep: Add assertion to check if in an interrupt Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: Add checks for dynticks counters in rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: Rename rcu_data's ->deferred_qs to ->exp_deferred_qs Paul E. McKenney
2019-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Remove unused rdp local from synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190530145229.29565-6-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox