From: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
To: skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.ibm.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3 1/6] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU basic concepts to reST
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:26:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625062627.26378-2-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190623081413.7095-1-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
RCU basic concepts reST markup.
Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt | 114 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt
index c818cf65c5a9..000da07d683e 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-RCU Concepts
+.. _rcu_doc:
+RCU Concepts
+============
The basic idea behind RCU (read-copy update) is to split destructive
operations into two parts, one that prevents anyone from seeing the data
@@ -11,79 +13,79 @@ from a linked list would first remove the item from the list, wait for
a grace period to elapse, then free the element. See the listRCU.txt
file for more information on using RCU with linked lists.
-
Frequently Asked Questions
+--------------------------
-o Why would anyone want to use RCU?
+- Why would anyone want to use RCU?
- The advantage of RCU's two-part approach is that RCU readers need
- not acquire any locks, perform any atomic instructions, write to
- shared memory, or (on CPUs other than Alpha) execute any memory
- barriers. The fact that these operations are quite expensive
- on modern CPUs is what gives RCU its performance advantages
- in read-mostly situations. The fact that RCU readers need not
- acquire locks can also greatly simplify deadlock-avoidance code.
+ The advantage of RCU's two-part approach is that RCU readers need
+ not acquire any locks, perform any atomic instructions, write to
+ shared memory, or (on CPUs other than Alpha) execute any memory
+ barriers. The fact that these operations are quite expensive
+ on modern CPUs is what gives RCU its performance advantages
+ in read-mostly situations. The fact that RCU readers need not
+ acquire locks can also greatly simplify deadlock-avoidance code.
-o How can the updater tell when a grace period has completed
- if the RCU readers give no indication when they are done?
+- How can the updater tell when a grace period has completed
+ if the RCU readers give no indication when they are done?
- Just as with spinlocks, RCU readers are not permitted to
- block, switch to user-mode execution, or enter the idle loop.
- Therefore, as soon as a CPU is seen passing through any of these
- three states, we know that that CPU has exited any previous RCU
- read-side critical sections. So, if we remove an item from a
- linked list, and then wait until all CPUs have switched context,
- executed in user mode, or executed in the idle loop, we can
- safely free up that item.
+ Just as with spinlocks, RCU readers are not permitted to
+ block, switch to user-mode execution, or enter the idle loop.
+ Therefore, as soon as a CPU is seen passing through any of these
+ three states, we know that that CPU has exited any previous RCU
+ read-side critical sections. So, if we remove an item from a
+ linked list, and then wait until all CPUs have switched context,
+ executed in user mode, or executed in the idle loop, we can
+ safely free up that item.
- Preemptible variants of RCU (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) get the
- same effect, but require that the readers manipulate CPU-local
- counters. These counters allow limited types of blocking within
- RCU read-side critical sections. SRCU also uses CPU-local
- counters, and permits general blocking within RCU read-side
- critical sections. These variants of RCU detect grace periods
- by sampling these counters.
+ Preemptible variants of RCU (CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) get the
+ same effect, but require that the readers manipulate CPU-local
+ counters. These counters allow limited types of blocking within
+ RCU read-side critical sections. SRCU also uses CPU-local
+ counters, and permits general blocking within RCU read-side
+ critical sections. These variants of RCU detect grace periods
+ by sampling these counters.
-o If I am running on a uniprocessor kernel, which can only do one
- thing at a time, why should I wait for a grace period?
+- If I am running on a uniprocessor kernel, which can only do one
+ thing at a time, why should I wait for a grace period?
- See the UP.txt file in this directory.
+ See the UP.txt file in this directory.
-o How can I see where RCU is currently used in the Linux kernel?
+- How can I see where RCU is currently used in the Linux kernel?
- Search for "rcu_read_lock", "rcu_read_unlock", "call_rcu",
- "rcu_read_lock_bh", "rcu_read_unlock_bh", "srcu_read_lock",
- "srcu_read_unlock", "synchronize_rcu", "synchronize_net",
- "synchronize_srcu", and the other RCU primitives. Or grab one
- of the cscope databases from:
+ Search for "rcu_read_lock", "rcu_read_unlock", "call_rcu",
+ "rcu_read_lock_bh", "rcu_read_unlock_bh", "srcu_read_lock",
+ "srcu_read_unlock", "synchronize_rcu", "synchronize_net",
+ "synchronize_srcu", and the other RCU primitives. Or grab one
+ of the cscope databases from:
- http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/linuxusage/rculocktab.html
+ (http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/linuxusage/rculocktab.html).
-o What guidelines should I follow when writing code that uses RCU?
+- What guidelines should I follow when writing code that uses RCU?
- See the checklist.txt file in this directory.
+ See the checklist.txt file in this directory.
-o Why the name "RCU"?
+- Why the name "RCU"?
- "RCU" stands for "read-copy update". The file listRCU.txt has
- more information on where this name came from, search for
- "read-copy update" to find it.
+ "RCU" stands for "read-copy update". The file listRCU.txt has
+ more information on where this name came from, search for
+ "read-copy update" to find it.
-o I hear that RCU is patented? What is with that?
+- I hear that RCU is patented? What is with that?
- Yes, it is. There are several known patents related to RCU,
- search for the string "Patent" in RTFP.txt to find them.
- Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the
- others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL.
- There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU
- available (http://liburcu.org/).
+ Yes, it is. There are several known patents related to RCU,
+ search for the string "Patent" in RTFP.txt to find them.
+ Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the
+ others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL.
+ There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU
+ available (http://liburcu.org/).
-o I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels?
+- I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels?
- Realtime-friendly RCU can be enabled via the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
- kernel configuration parameter.
+ Realtime-friendly RCU can be enabled via the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
+ kernel configuration parameter.
-o Where can I find more information on RCU?
+- Where can I find more information on RCU?
- See the RTFP.txt file in this directory.
- Or point your browser at http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/.
+ See the RTFP.txt file in this directory.
+ Or point your browser at (http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU/).
--
2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190623081413.7095-1-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
2019-06-25 6:26 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3 0/6] Documentation: RCU: Convert to reST Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 19:12 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v4 0/5] " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 20:07 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v5 " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 20:07 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU basic concepts " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-27 14:34 ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-06-27 15:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-06-27 16:48 ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-27 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-27 16:47 ` Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 20:07 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v5 2/5] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU linked list " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 20:07 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v5 3/5] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU UP systems " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 20:07 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v5 4/5] Documentation: RCU: Rename txt files to rst Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 20:07 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v5 5/5] Documentation: RCU: Add TOC tree hooks Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 19:12 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v4 1/5] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU basic concepts to reST Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 19:12 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v4 2/5] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU linked list " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 19:12 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v4 3/5] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU UP systems " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 19:12 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v4 4/5] Documentation: RCU: Rename txt files to rst Jiunn Chang
2019-06-26 19:12 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v4 5/5] Documentation: RCU: Add TOC tree hooks Jiunn Chang
2019-06-25 6:26 ` Jiunn Chang [this message]
2019-06-25 6:26 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3 2/6] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU linked list to reST Jiunn Chang
2019-06-25 6:26 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3 3/6] Documentation: RCU: Convert RCU UP systems " Jiunn Chang
2019-06-25 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-25 6:26 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3 4/6] Documentation: RCU: Rename txt files to rst Jiunn Chang
2019-06-25 6:26 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3 5/6] Documentation: RCU: Add links to rcu.rst Jiunn Chang
2019-06-25 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-25 21:01 ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-06-25 21:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-25 21:40 ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-06-25 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-25 6:26 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees][PATCH v3 6/6] Documentation: RCU: Add TOC tree hooks Jiunn Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190625062627.26378-2-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com \
--to=c0d1n61at3@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox