From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Cc: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
zhengchuan@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure last_lookup set as NULL after part deleted
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:19:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200108031941.GD28075@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <762e1d7b-af3e-93f4-c744-ecd8ae8946e8@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 07:40:10PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2020/1/6 18:05, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:41:45PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> [snipped]
>
> >> Yes. The solution you proposed also adds an invocation of percpu_ref_tryget_live()
> >> in the fast path. Not sure which one will have a better performance. However the
> >> reason we prefer the index caching is the simplicity instead of performance.
> >
> > No, hd_struct_try_get() and hd_struct_get() is always called once for one IO, the
> > patch I proposed changes nothing about this usage.
> >
> > Please take a close look at the patch:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/5cc465cc-d68c-088e-0729-2695279c7853@huawei.com/T/#m8f3e6b4e77eadf006ce142a84c966f50f3a9ae26
> >
> > which just moves hd_struct_try_get() from blk_account_io_start() into
> > disk_map_sector_rcu(), doesn't it?
> >
> Yes, you are right. And a little suggestion for your patch:
>
> @@ -283,8 +289,9 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
> if (!part)
> return;
>
> + get_device(disk_to_dev(disk));
> rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], NULL);
> - rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
> +
> kobject_put(part->holder_dir);
> device_del(part_to_dev(part));
>
> Could we move the call of get_device() into add_partition, and that will make the assignment of
> disk to p->disk in add_partition() be natural ?
It isn't necessary to do that way, the parent disk's refcount isn't released
until device_del(part_to_dev(part)). So it is enough to hold disk's refcount
before calling device_del(part).
>
> Maybe there is no need to add a new disk field in hd_struct, because the kobject of gendisk
> is already the parent of hd_struct. But make use of part->__dev.parent after the calling
> of device_del() is a bad_idea.
Yeah, that is why I added 'disk' field, which can be put with other
fields not accessed in fast path.
BTW, 'struct percpu_ref ref' should have been put just after 'nr_sects',
then these fast path fields can share single cache line.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-08 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191231110945.10857-1-yuyufen@huawei.com>
2019-12-31 14:55 ` [PATCH] block: make sure last_lookup set as NULL after part deleted Hou Tao
2019-12-31 23:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-01 2:33 ` htbegin
2020-01-01 3:39 ` htbegin
2020-01-03 23:45 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-01-04 9:16 ` Hou Tao
2020-01-02 1:23 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03 3:06 ` Hou Tao
2020-01-03 4:18 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03 7:35 ` Hou Tao
2020-01-03 8:17 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03 12:03 ` Yufen Yu
2020-01-03 15:16 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-06 7:39 ` Yufen Yu
2020-01-06 8:11 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-06 9:41 ` Hou Tao
2020-01-06 10:05 ` Ming Lei
2020-01-07 11:40 ` Hou Tao
2020-01-08 3:19 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-01-03 12:43 ` Yufen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200108031941.GD28075@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengchuan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox