From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] rcu: simplify the calculation of rcu_state.ncpus
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:41:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420014137.GW17661@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200419215715.21071-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:57:15PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> There is only 1 bit set in mask, which means the difference between
> oldmask and the new one would be at the position where the bit is set in
> mask.
>
> Based on this knowledge, rcu_state.ncpus could be calculated by checking
> whether mask is already set in rnp->expmaskinitnext.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Queued, thank you!
I updated the commit log as shown below, so please let me know if I
messed something up.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 2ff1b8268456b1a476f8b79672c87d32d4f59024
Author: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Apr 19 21:57:15 2020 +0000
rcu: Simplify the calculation of rcu_state.ncpus
There is only 1 bit set in mask, which means that the only difference
between oldmask and the new one will be at the position where the bit is
set in mask. This commit therefore updates rcu_state.ncpus by checking
whether the bit in mask is already set in rnp->expmaskinitnext.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f288477..6d39485 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3732,10 +3732,9 @@ void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long mask;
- int nbits;
- unsigned long oldmask;
struct rcu_data *rdp;
struct rcu_node *rnp;
+ bool newcpu;
if (per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu))
return;
@@ -3747,12 +3746,10 @@ void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
mask = rdp->grpmask;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
WRITE_ONCE(rnp->qsmaskinitnext, rnp->qsmaskinitnext | mask);
- oldmask = rnp->expmaskinitnext;
+ newcpu = !(rnp->expmaskinitnext & mask);
rnp->expmaskinitnext |= mask;
- oldmask ^= rnp->expmaskinitnext;
- nbits = bitmap_weight(&oldmask, BITS_PER_LONG);
/* Allow lockless access for expedited grace periods. */
- smp_store_release(&rcu_state.ncpus, rcu_state.ncpus + nbits); /* ^^^ */
+ smp_store_release(&rcu_state.ncpus, rcu_state.ncpus + newcpu); /* ^^^ */
ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(rcu_state.ncpus);
rcu_gpnum_ovf(rnp, rdp); /* Offline-induced counter wrap? */
rdp->rcu_onl_gp_seq = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-19 21:57 [Patch v2] rcu: simplify the calculation of rcu_state.ncpus Wei Yang
2020-04-20 1:41 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-04-20 21:28 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200420014137.GW17661@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox