Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:59:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200924225959.GY29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1600929250-20344-1-git-send-email-neeraju@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:04:10PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> Clarify the "x" in rcuox/N naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
> description.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>

Applied with a few additional updates as shown below.  As always, please
let me know if I messed anything up.

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 8d1d776b4998896a6f8f4608edb0b258bd37ec9f
Author: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu Sep 24 12:04:10 2020 +0530

    rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
    
    This commit clarifies that the "p" and the "s" in the in the RCU_NOCB_CPU
    config-option description refer to the "x" in the "rcuox/N" kthread name.
    
    Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
    [ paulmck: While in the area, update description and advice. ]
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index b71e21f..cdc57b4 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -221,19 +221,23 @@ config RCU_NOCB_CPU
 	  Use this option to reduce OS jitter for aggressive HPC or
 	  real-time workloads.	It can also be used to offload RCU
 	  callback invocation to energy-efficient CPUs in battery-powered
-	  asymmetric multiprocessors.
+	  asymmetric multiprocessors.  The price of this reduced jitter
+	  is that the overhead of call_rcu() increases and that some
+	  workloads will incur significant increases in context-switch
+	  rates.
 
 	  This option offloads callback invocation from the set of CPUs
 	  specified at boot time by the rcu_nocbs parameter.  For each
 	  such CPU, a kthread ("rcuox/N") will be created to invoke
 	  callbacks, where the "N" is the CPU being offloaded, and where
-	  the "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPTION kernels) and "s" for RCU-sched
-	  (!PREEMPTION kernels).  Nothing prevents this kthread from running
-	  on the specified CPUs, but (1) the kthreads may be preempted
-	  between each callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can be used
-	  to force the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is desired.
-
-	  Say Y here if you want to help to debug reduced OS jitter.
+	  the "x" is "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPTION kernels) and "s" for
+	  RCU-sched (!PREEMPTION kernels).  Nothing prevents this kthread
+	  from running on the specified CPUs, but (1) the kthreads may be
+	  preempted between each callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can
+	  be used to force the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is
+	  desired.
+
+	  Say Y here if you need reduced OS jitter, despite added overhead.
 	  Say N here if you are unsure.
 
 config TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-24 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-24  6:34 [PATCH] rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-09-24 22:59 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-09-25  5:47   ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-09-28  0:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-28  3:41   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200924225959.GY29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox