From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AE2C4727E for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA226208C7 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:03:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601568236; bh=tPAbUsIyJx/7A7VHjxZeeEsElWnfl/HBPtl67O4vTvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID: From; b=OluzIxR945xUM8Q/4XLIk1umFp8YT0yn+AS2sXyfe7JFr6i9r2HwvuYwHouR4I2nW GUAZCyYFhkqYnqrhoYadW91Xqm4Oqp7/jfpQ2Nx62S4cD+2JjN3/CeFTpE7qa6zav3 7S7xWvEe/4fTo9FNnDPzL0XFXj5dDILdXEeDZYTw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732368AbgJAQDz (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:03:55 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34918 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732242AbgJAQDz (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:03:55 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (unknown [50.45.173.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0124620872; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:03:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601568235; bh=tPAbUsIyJx/7A7VHjxZeeEsElWnfl/HBPtl67O4vTvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HvzwcNriJ1FpPxUkkMHDDjM8CjnqGRzMzcIOPJ00vQgPr1sbggefQpPQRzKfXGQkC NS69q07UzhQsb1c/SWQoajUgnWuHFPtlWhrsmznKxJfoz0gb2FAG/5A4V22q9/yv/F Vi1dJ9FEFq0fDdvPTWhlUWhTXMHtBYgMHn5q6gc8= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC88D3522B33; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:03:54 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Joonas Lahtinen , rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Jani Nikula , Rodrigo Vivi , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers Message-ID: <20201001160354.GC29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <20200928233041.GA23230@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200928233102.24265-11-paulmck@kernel.org> <160153665673.4398.6268028176406103680@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:25:06AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 10:17, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Quoting paulmck@kernel.org (2020-09-29 02:30:58) > >> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is now unconditionally enabled and will be > >> removed. Cleanup the leftovers before doing so. > > > > Change looks fine: > > > > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen Applied, thank you! > > Are you looking for us to merge or merge through another tree? > > > > If us, did the base patch always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT go into 5.9 or is > > it heading to 5.10? We can queue this earliest for 5.11 as drm-next closed > > for 5.10 at week of -rc5. > > If at all it goes through rcu/tip because it depends on the earlier patches. I was figuring on sending a pull request later today, Pacific Time. Thanx, Paul