From: neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, urezki@gmail.com,
frederic@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
leobras@redhat.com, imran.f.khan@oracle.com, riel@surriel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH rcu 2/4] locking/csd_lock: Provide an indication of ongoing CSD-lock stall
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 10:09:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240816043917.26537-2-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240816043600.GA25206@neeraj.linux>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
If a CSD-lock stall goes on long enough, it will cause an RCU CPU
stall warning. This additional warning provides much additional
console-log traffic and little additional information. Therefore,
provide a new csd_lock_is_stuck() function that returns true if there
is an ongoing CSD-lock stall. This function will be used by the RCU
CPU stall warnings to provide a one-line indication of the stall when
this function returns true.
[ neeraj.upadhyay: Apply Rik van Riel feedback. ]
[ neeraj.upadhyay: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/smp.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/smp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 +
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index fcd61dfe2af3..3871bd32018f 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -294,4 +294,10 @@ int smpcfd_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
int smpcfd_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
int smpcfd_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CSD_LOCK_WAIT_DEBUG
+bool csd_lock_is_stuck(void);
+#else
+static inline bool csd_lock_is_stuck(void) { return false; }
+#endif
+
#endif /* __LINUX_SMP_H */
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index e87953729230..202cda4d2a55 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -208,6 +208,19 @@ static int csd_lock_wait_getcpu(call_single_data_t *csd)
return -1;
}
+static atomic_t n_csd_lock_stuck;
+
+/**
+ * csd_lock_is_stuck - Has a CSD-lock acquisition been stuck too long?
+ *
+ * Returns @true if a CSD-lock acquisition is stuck and has been stuck
+ * long enough for a "non-responsive CSD lock" message to be printed.
+ */
+bool csd_lock_is_stuck(void)
+{
+ return !!atomic_read(&n_csd_lock_stuck);
+}
+
/*
* Complain if too much time spent waiting. Note that only
* the CSD_TYPE_SYNC/ASYNC types provide the destination CPU,
@@ -229,6 +242,7 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
cpu = csd_lock_wait_getcpu(csd);
pr_alert("csd: CSD lock (#%d) got unstuck on CPU#%02d, CPU#%02d released the lock.\n",
*bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), cpu);
+ atomic_dec(&n_csd_lock_stuck);
return true;
}
@@ -252,6 +266,8 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
pr_alert("csd: %s non-responsive CSD lock (#%d) on CPU#%d, waiting %lld ns for CPU#%02d %pS(%ps).\n",
firsttime ? "Detected" : "Continued", *bug_id, raw_smp_processor_id(), (s64)ts_delta,
cpu, csd->func, csd->info);
+ if (firsttime)
+ atomic_inc(&n_csd_lock_stuck);
/*
* If the CSD lock is still stuck after 5 minutes, it is unlikely
* to become unstuck. Use a signed comparison to avoid triggering
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index a30c03a66172..4e5f61cba8e4 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1614,6 +1614,7 @@ config SCF_TORTURE_TEST
config CSD_LOCK_WAIT_DEBUG
bool "Debugging for csd_lock_wait(), called from smp_call_function*()"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
+ depends on SMP
depends on 64BIT
default n
help
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-16 4:36 [PATCH rcu 0/4] CSD-lock diagnostics updates for v6.12 Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-08-16 4:39 ` [PATCH rcu 1/4] locking/csd_lock: Print large numbers as negatives neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16 4:39 ` neeraj.upadhyay [this message]
2024-08-16 4:39 ` [PATCH rcu 3/4] locking/csd-lock: Use backoff for repeated reports of same incident neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16 4:39 ` [PATCH rcu 4/4] smp: print only local CPU info when sched_clock goes backward neeraj.upadhyay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240816043917.26537-2-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--to=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox