Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
	neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, urezki@gmail.com,
	frederic@kernel.org,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 02/14] refscale: Optimize process_durations()
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:32:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240816070256.60993-2-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240816070209.GA60666@neeraj.linux>

From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to
iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'.

Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer.
Data is written directly at the correct place.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Tested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/refscale.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
index f4ea5b1ec068..cfec0648e141 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/seq_buf.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/stat.h>
@@ -891,32 +892,34 @@ static u64 process_durations(int n)
 {
 	int i;
 	struct reader_task *rt;
-	char buf1[64];
+	struct seq_buf s;
 	char *buf;
 	u64 sum = 0;
 
 	buf = kmalloc(800 + 64, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!buf)
 		return 0;
-	buf[0] = 0;
-	sprintf(buf, "Experiment #%d (Format: <THREAD-NUM>:<Total loop time in ns>)",
-		exp_idx);
+	seq_buf_init(&s, buf, 800 + 64);
+
+	seq_buf_printf(&s, "Experiment #%d (Format: <THREAD-NUM>:<Total loop time in ns>)",
+		       exp_idx);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < n && !torture_must_stop(); i++) {
 		rt = &(reader_tasks[i]);
-		sprintf(buf1, "%d: %llu\t", i, rt->last_duration_ns);
 
 		if (i % 5 == 0)
-			strcat(buf, "\n");
-		if (strlen(buf) >= 800) {
-			pr_alert("%s", buf);
-			buf[0] = 0;
+			seq_buf_putc(&s, '\n');
+
+		if (seq_buf_used(&s) >= 800) {
+			pr_alert("%s", seq_buf_str(&s));
+			seq_buf_clear(&s);
 		}
-		strcat(buf, buf1);
+
+		seq_buf_printf(&s, "%d: %llu\t", i, rt->last_duration_ns);
 
 		sum += rt->last_duration_ns;
 	}
-	pr_alert("%s\n", buf);
+	pr_alert("%s\n", seq_buf_str(&s));
 
 	kfree(buf);
 	return sum;
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-16  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-16  7:02 [PATCH rcu 00/14] RCU scaling tests updates for v6.12 Neeraj Upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 01/14] refscale: Add TINY scenario neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` neeraj.upadhyay [this message]
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 03/14] rcuscale: Save a few lines with whitespace-only change neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 04/14] rcuscale: Dump stacks of stalled rcu_scale_writer() instances neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 05/14] rcuscale: Dump grace-period statistics when rcu_scale_writer() stalls neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 06/14] rcu: Mark callbacks not currently participating in barrier operation neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 07/14] rcuscale: Print detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 08/14] rcuscale: Provide clear error when async specified without primitives neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 09/14] rcuscale: Make all writer tasks report upon hang neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 10/14] rcuscale: Make rcu_scale_writer() tolerate repeated GFP_KERNEL failure neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 11/14] rcuscale: Use special allocator for rcu_scale_writer() neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 12/14] rcuscale: NULL out top-level pointers to heap memory neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 13/14] rcuscale: Count outstanding callbacks per-task rather than per-CPU neeraj.upadhyay
2024-08-16  7:02 ` [PATCH rcu 14/14] refscale: Constify struct ref_scale_ops neeraj.upadhyay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240816070256.60993-2-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --to=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox