From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] rcu: Finer-grained grace-period-end checks in rcu_dump_cpu_stacks()
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:37:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112143711.21239-4-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112143711.21239-1-frederic@kernel.org>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit pushes the grace-period-end checks further down into
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(), and also uses lockless checks coupled with
finer-grained locking.
The result is that the current leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock is
acquired only if a stack backtrace might be needed from the current CPU,
and is held across only that CPU's backtrace. As a result, if there are
no stalled CPUs associated with a given rcu_node structure, then its
->lock will not be acquired at all. On large systems, it is usually
(though not always) the case that a small number of CPUs are stalling
the current grace period, which means that the ->lock need be acquired
only for a small fraction of the rcu_node structures.
[ paulmck: Apply Dan Carpenter feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
index b530844becf8..925fcdad5dea 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
@@ -342,20 +342,24 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(unsigned long gp_seq)
struct rcu_node *rnp;
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
- if (gp_seq != data_race(rcu_state.gp_seq)) {
- pr_err("INFO: Stall ended during stack backtracing.\n");
- return;
- }
printk_deferred_enter();
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
- for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
+ for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
+ if (gp_seq != data_race(rcu_state.gp_seq)) {
+ printk_deferred_exit();
+ pr_err("INFO: Stall ended during stack backtracing.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ if (!(data_race(rnp->qsmask) & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)))
+ continue;
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
if (rnp->qsmask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) {
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
pr_err("Offline CPU %d blocking current GP.\n", cpu);
else
dump_cpu_task(cpu);
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ }
printk_deferred_exit();
}
}
--
2.46.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 14:37 [PATCH 0/3] RCU stall for v6.13 Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] rcu: Delete unused rcu_gp_might_be_stalled() function Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] rcu: Stop stall warning from dumping stacks if grace period ends Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112143711.21239-4-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox