From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/16] srcu: Allow inlining of __srcu_read_{,un}lock_lite()
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:51:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112145159.23032-11-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241112145159.23032-1-frederic@kernel.org>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves __srcu_read_lock_lite() and __srcu_read_unlock_lite()
into include/linux/srcu.h and marks them "static inline" so that they
can be inlined into srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite(),
respectively. They are not hand-inlined due to Tree SRCU and Tiny SRCU
having different implementations.
The earlier removal of smp_mb() combined with the inlining produce
significant single-percentage performance wins.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEf4BzYgiNmSb=ZKQ65tm6nJDi1UX2Gq26cdHSH1mPwXJYZj5g@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/srcutree.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 41 ----------------------------------------
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
index 8074138cbd62..778eb61542e1 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
@@ -209,4 +209,43 @@ void synchronize_srcu_expedited(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
void srcu_barrier(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf);
+/*
+ * Counts the new reader in the appropriate per-CPU element of the
+ * srcu_struct. Returns an index that must be passed to the matching
+ * srcu_read_unlock_lite().
+ *
+ * Note that this_cpu_inc() is an RCU read-side critical section either
+ * because it disables interrupts, because it is a single instruction,
+ * or because it is a read-modify-write atomic operation, depending on
+ * the whims of the architecture.
+ */
+static inline int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+{
+ int idx;
+
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "RCU must be watching srcu_read_lock_lite().");
+ idx = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) & 0x1;
+ this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_lock_count[idx].counter); /* Y */
+ barrier(); /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
+ return idx;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Removes the count for the old reader from the appropriate
+ * per-CPU element of the srcu_struct. Note that this may well be a
+ * different CPU than that which was incremented by the corresponding
+ * srcu_read_lock_lite(), but it must be within the same task.
+ *
+ * Note that this_cpu_inc() is an RCU read-side critical section either
+ * because it disables interrupts, because it is a single instruction,
+ * or because it is a read-modify-write atomic operation, depending on
+ * the whims of the architecture.
+ */
+static inline void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
+{
+ barrier(); /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
+ this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_unlock_count[idx].counter); /* Z */
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "RCU must be watching srcu_read_unlock_lite().");
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 8632a3caeb33..d3a0c76ce590 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -763,47 +763,6 @@ void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock);
-/*
- * Counts the new reader in the appropriate per-CPU element of the
- * srcu_struct. Returns an index that must be passed to the matching
- * srcu_read_unlock_lite().
- *
- * Note that this_cpu_inc() is an RCU read-side critical section either
- * because it disables interrupts, because it is a single instruction,
- * or because it is a read-modify-write atomic operation, depending on
- * the whims of the architecture.
- */
-int __srcu_read_lock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
-{
- int idx;
-
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "RCU must be watching srcu_read_lock_lite().");
- idx = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) & 0x1;
- this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_lock_count[idx].counter); /* Y */
- barrier(); /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
- return idx;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_lock_lite);
-
-/*
- * Removes the count for the old reader from the appropriate
- * per-CPU element of the srcu_struct. Note that this may well be a
- * different CPU than that which was incremented by the corresponding
- * srcu_read_lock_lite(), but it must be within the same task.
- *
- * Note that this_cpu_inc() is an RCU read-side critical section either
- * because it disables interrupts, because it is a single instruction,
- * or because it is a read-modify-write atomic operation, depending on
- * the whims of the architecture.
- */
-void __srcu_read_unlock_lite(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
-{
- barrier(); /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */
- this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_unlock_count[idx].counter); /* Z */
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_is_watching(), "RCU must be watching srcu_read_unlock_lite().");
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock_lite);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SRCU_NMI_SAFE
/*
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 14:51 [PATCH 00/16] SRCU for v6.13 Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 01/16] srcu: Replace WARN_ON_ONCE() with BUILD_BUG_ON() if possible Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 02/16] srcu: Rename srcu_might_be_idle() to srcu_should_expedite() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 03/16] srcu: Introduce srcu_gp_is_expedited() helper function Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 04/16] srcu: Renaming in preparation for additional reader flavor Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 05/16] srcu: Bit manipulation changes " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 06/16] srcu: Standardize srcu_data pointers to "sdp" and similar Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 07/16] srcu: Improve srcu_read_lock{,_nmisafe}() comments Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 08/16] srcu: Create CPP macros for normal and NMI-safe SRCU readers Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 09/16] srcu: Add srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 11/16] rcutorture: Expand RCUTORTURE_RDR_MASK_[12] to eight bits Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 12/16] rcutorture: Add reader_flavor parameter for SRCU readers Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 13/16] rcutorture: Add srcu_read_lock_lite() support to rcutorture.reader_flavor Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 14/16] rcutorture: Add light-weight SRCU scenario Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 15/16] refscale: Add srcu_read_lock_lite() support using "srcu-lite" Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-12 14:51 ` [PATCH 16/16] srcu: Improve srcu_read_lock_lite() kernel-doc comment Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112145159.23032-11-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox