public inbox for rcu@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@linux.ibm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, aboorvad@linux.ibm.com
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com, frederic@kernel.org, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, srikar@linux.ibm.com,
	sshegde@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, urezki@gmail.com,
	samir@linux.ibm.com, vishalc@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpuhp: Expedite RCU grace periods during SMT operations
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:49:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260216121927.489062-6-vishalc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260216121927.489062-2-vishalc@linux.ibm.com>

Expedite synchronize_rcu during the SMT mode switch operation when
initiated via /sys/devices/system/cpu/smt/control interface

SMT mode switch operation i.e. between SMT 8 to SMT 1 or vice versa and
others, are user driven operations and therefore should complete as soon
as possible. Switching SMT states involves iterating over a list of CPUs
and performing hotplug operations. It was found these transitions took
significantly large amount of time to complete particularly on
high-core-count systems because system was blocked on synchronize_rcu
calls.

Below is one of the call-stacks that accounted for most of the blocking
time overhead as reported by offcputime bcc script for CPU offline
operation,

    finish_task_switch
    __schedule
    schedule
    schedule_timeout
    wait_for_completion
    __wait_rcu_gp
    synchronize_rcu
    cpuidle_uninstall_idle_handler
    powernv_cpuidle_cpu_dead
    cpuhp_invoke_callback
    __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range
    _cpu_down
    cpu_device_down
    cpu_subsys_offline
    device_offline
    online_store
    dev_attr_store
    sysfs_kf_write
    kernfs_fop_write_iter
    vfs_write
    ksys_write
    system_call_exception
    system_call_common
   -                bash (29705)
        5771569  ------------------------>  Duration (us)

Signed-off-by: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@linux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3 +++
 kernel/cpu.c             | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 7729fef249e1..f12d0d0f008d 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -1190,6 +1190,9 @@ rcu_head_after_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t f)
 extern int rcu_expedited;
 extern int rcu_normal;
 
+extern void rcu_expedite_gp(void);
+extern void rcu_unexpedite_gp(void);
+
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(rcu, rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_unlock())
 DECLARE_LOCK_GUARD_0_ATTRS(rcu, __acquires_shared(RCU), __releases_shared(RCU))
 
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index edaa37419036..f5517d64d3f3 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -2683,6 +2683,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
 		ret = -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
 	}
+	rcu_expedite_gp();
 	/* Hold cpus_write_lock() for entire batch operation. */
 	cpus_write_lock();
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -2715,6 +2716,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
 	if (!ret)
 		cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
 	cpus_write_unlock();
+	rcu_unexpedite_gp();
 	arch_smt_update();
 out:
 	cpu_maps_update_done();
@@ -2734,6 +2736,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
 	int cpu, ret = 0;
 
 	cpu_maps_update_begin();
+	rcu_expedite_gp();
 	/* Hold cpus_write_lock() for entire batch operation. */
 	cpus_write_lock();
 	cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
@@ -2750,6 +2753,7 @@ int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
 		cpuhp_online_cpu_device(cpu);
 	}
 	cpus_write_unlock();
+	rcu_unexpedite_gp();
 	arch_smt_update();
 	cpu_maps_update_done();
 	return ret;
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-16 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-16 12:19 [PATCH v2 0/2] cpuhp: Improve SMT switch time via lock batching and RCU expedition Vishal Chourasia
2026-02-16 12:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cpuhp: Optimize SMT switch operation by batching lock acquisition Vishal Chourasia
2026-02-16 12:48   ` Vishal Chourasia
2026-02-16 12:57   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-16 13:28     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-02-16 12:19 ` Vishal Chourasia [this message]
2026-02-16 16:05   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpuhp: Expedite RCU grace periods during SMT operations kernel test robot
2026-02-16 16:38   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-16 17:10   ` Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260216121927.489062-6-vishalc@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=vishalc@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=samir@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox