From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] srcu: Use irq_work to start GP in tiny SRCU
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 20:14:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260324001418.89363-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> (raw)
Tiny SRCU's srcu_gp_start_if_needed() directly calls schedule_work(),
which acquires the workqueue pool->lock.
This causes a lockdep splat when call_srcu() is called with a scheduler
lock held, due to:
call_srcu() [holding pi_lock]
srcu_gp_start_if_needed()
schedule_work() -> pool->lock
workqueue_init() / create_worker() [holding pool->lock]
wake_up_process() -> try_to_wake_up() -> pi_lock
Also add irq_work_sync() to cleanup_srcu_struct() to prevent a
use-after-free if a queued irq_work fires after cleanup begins.
Tested with rcutorture SRCU-T and no lockdep warnings.
[ Thanks to Boqun for similar fix in patch "rcu: Use an intermediate irq_work
to start process_srcu()" ]
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
---
include/linux/srcutiny.h | 4 ++++
kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcutiny.h b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
index dec7cbe015aa..905b629e8fa3 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_SRCU_TINY_H
#define _LINUX_SRCU_TINY_H
+#include <linux/irq_work_types.h>
#include <linux/swait.h>
struct srcu_struct {
@@ -24,18 +25,21 @@ struct srcu_struct {
struct rcu_head *srcu_cb_head; /* Pending callbacks: Head. */
struct rcu_head **srcu_cb_tail; /* Pending callbacks: Tail. */
struct work_struct srcu_work; /* For driving grace periods. */
+ struct irq_work srcu_irq_work; /* Defer schedule_work() to irq work. */
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
};
void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp);
+void srcu_tiny_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work);
#define __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, __ignored, ___ignored, ____ignored) \
{ \
.srcu_wq = __SWAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.srcu_wq), \
.srcu_cb_tail = &name.srcu_cb_head, \
.srcu_work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(name.srcu_work, srcu_drive_gp), \
+ .srcu_irq_work = { .func = srcu_tiny_irq_work }, \
__SRCU_DEP_MAP_INIT(name) \
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
index 3450c3751ef7..a2e2d516e51b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/irq_work.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
ssp->srcu_idx_max = 0;
INIT_WORK(&ssp->srcu_work, srcu_drive_gp);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ssp->srcu_work.entry);
+ init_irq_work(&ssp->srcu_irq_work, srcu_tiny_irq_work);
return 0;
}
@@ -84,6 +86,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_srcu_struct);
void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[0] || ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[1]);
+ irq_work_sync(&ssp->srcu_irq_work);
flush_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_gp_running);
WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting);
@@ -177,6 +180,20 @@ void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_drive_gp);
+/*
+ * Use an irq_work to defer schedule_work() to avoid acquiring the workqueue
+ * pool->lock while the caller might hold scheduler locks, causing lockdep
+ * splats due to workqueue_init() doing a wakeup.
+ */
+void srcu_tiny_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
+{
+ struct srcu_struct *ssp;
+
+ ssp = container_of(irq_work, struct srcu_struct, srcu_irq_work);
+ schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_tiny_irq_work);
+
static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
unsigned long cookie;
@@ -189,7 +206,7 @@ static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max, cookie);
if (!READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running)) {
if (likely(srcu_init_done))
- schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
+ irq_work_queue(&ssp->srcu_irq_work);
else if (list_empty(&ssp->srcu_work.entry))
list_add(&ssp->srcu_work.entry, &srcu_boot_list);
}
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-24 0:14 Joel Fernandes [this message]
2026-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH] srcu: Use irq_work to start GP in tiny SRCU Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260324001418.89363-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--to=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox