From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add a test for bpf_call_rcu_tasks_trace()
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 06:45:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907134552.1772405-5-puranjay@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907134552.1772405-1-puranjay@kernel.org>
Run the same functional test against the tasks trace flavour.
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/call_rcu.c | 12 ++++++++----
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/call_rcu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/call_rcu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/call_rcu.c
index ccbfa9965d511..56f0ea3e5a0fe 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/call_rcu.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/call_rcu.c
@@ -24,9 +24,10 @@ static bool wait_for_callbacks(struct call_rcu *skel, int expected)
return false;
}
-static void test_call_rcu_run(void)
+static void test_call_rcu_run(bool trace)
{
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts);
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
struct call_rcu *skel;
struct elem elem;
__u32 key = 1;
@@ -36,7 +37,8 @@ static void test_call_rcu_run(void)
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_and_load"))
return;
- err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.arm), &opts);
+ prog = trace ? skel->progs.arm_trace : skel->progs.arm;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &opts);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run") || !ASSERT_EQ(opts.retval, 0, "retval"))
goto out;
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ static void test_call_rcu_run(void)
ASSERT_EQ(elem.val, 0, "value_cleared");
/* The head is disarmed before the callback runs, so it can be reused. */
- err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.arm), &opts);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(bpf_program__fd(prog), &opts);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_again"))
goto out;
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arm_err, 0, "rearm_err");
@@ -172,7 +174,9 @@ static void test_call_rcu_inner_map(void)
void test_call_rcu(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("run"))
- test_call_rcu_run();
+ test_call_rcu_run(false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("run_tasks_trace"))
+ test_call_rcu_run(true);
if (test__start_subtest("chain"))
test_call_rcu_chain();
if (test__start_subtest("teardown"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/call_rcu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/call_rcu.c
index 50349b104d1a6..8f5884f26ccd4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/call_rcu.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/call_rcu.c
@@ -65,6 +65,23 @@ int arm(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+SEC("syscall")
+int arm_trace(void *ctx)
+{
+ __u32 key = 1;
+ struct elem *e;
+
+ e = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arr, &key);
+ if (!e)
+ return 1;
+
+ e->val = 0xdeadbeef;
+ /* No lock needed: the enclosing rcu_read_lock_trace() already blocks the grace period. */
+ arm_err = bpf_call_rcu_tasks_trace(&e->rh, &arr, reclaim);
+ busy_err = bpf_call_rcu_tasks_trace(&e->rh, &arr, reclaim);
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
int dump(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
{
--
2.53.0-Meta
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 13:45 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Add bpf_call_rcu() and bpf_call_rcu_tasks_trace() Puranjay Mohan
2026-09-07 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Add bpf_call_rcu() kfunc Puranjay Mohan
2026-09-07 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_call_rcu() Puranjay Mohan
2026-09-07 13:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Add bpf_call_rcu_tasks_trace() kfunc Puranjay Mohan
2026-09-07 13:45 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907134552.1772405-5-puranjay@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox