From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086BCC10F11 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8A02082E for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=efficios.com header.i=@efficios.com header.b="qqHkI44P" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725938AbfDJEUv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:51 -0400 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([167.114.142.138]:47014 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725835AbfDJEUv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DE91D5E48; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.efficios.com ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail02.efficios.com [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 4lpnZ8M89aeY; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961FF1D5E42; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.efficios.com 961FF1D5E42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=efficios.com; s=default; t=1554870049; bh=TiAMzGmAJm0ScciKXOR3aomQUAKVtUVfBwsaVA/f1ow=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=qqHkI44PK7tt7oCUBZCws3kAbN9ztcuhXpvgiDax33jHM/M7X9KEjKPXFh0q2EZ5d VU70iO6nBMoVxJNZk0EZzEnrFCPukW3efbqHZqBWL2f+FgaI2mEBEXY7WiSikC8EtR SDLrrnHgxC81FYrqqTenQFVyV2hFBZta3dJDiAV81jr8fUR3qgYGg/wwmewS17zAgW 1bnajV1bMemphSQP8ALuf6yJwWf8sXSSxZeCGRgTqTy/OEHBChb7rYu8A+7Vd1sDpr 1FTvrv60UXBy69asoijS8B8by2Sy/HBwZfyudbVYYi5DthD05ZSIWcay2P4dQ12Z7I xHlzsewg4ks3g== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at efficios.com Received: from mail.efficios.com ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail02.efficios.com [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id oRQ38X3Twyhy; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail02.efficios.com (mail02.efficios.com [167.114.142.138]) by mail.efficios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792DC1D5E3C; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:20:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Joel Fernandes Cc: rostedt , "Joel Fernandes, Google" , linux-kernel , Paul McKenney , Kees Cook , Jessica Yu , kernel-hardening , kernel-team , rcu Message-ID: <475423743.2834.1554870049461.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190410011418.76408-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20190410011418.76408-2-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20190409223820.511e3671@oasis.local.home> <20190410024103.GA104423@google.com> <20190409224826.308b12a4@oasis.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: Make srcu_struct ptr array as read-only post init MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [167.114.142.138] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3794 (ZimbraWebClient - FF66 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3794) Thread-Topic: module: Make srcu_struct ptr array as read-only post init Thread-Index: S1oZQGKExjQi6X7deCx2BAyn87KuYg== Sender: rcu-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org ----- On Apr 9, 2019, at 11:38 PM, Joel Fernandes joelaf@google.com wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:48 PM Steven Rostedt wrote: >> >> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:41:03 -0400 >> Joel Fernandes wrote: >> >> > > Other than that, the two patches look fine to me. >> > >> > Could I add your Reviewed-by in the respin? >> >> You can add an Acked-by, as I haven't spent enough time to offer a >> Reviewed-by tag. ;-) >> >> Maybe I'll get some time to vet it a bit more tomorrow, and then >> upgrade the ack to a review. >> >> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) >> > > Thanks! > > Also we could possibly consider adding the tracepoint ptrs array as > well to the list, which would be useful I think, if one were to over > write that array by accident (and the bpf tps related array too). Yes, please! Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com