From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7828F3BFE4C for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777295313; cv=none; b=OCdNjx3l0UZT4zfevVqUbZJWew3uTNGMVbA55o/6204pWk6y7UcT4WLurSwwlu20XprzuvR3BgG/vz55vGyM3WJ4uxbstSP9t5MqmQ6paOzlFxdoslzVCNT4pFkCDRW1R4pYzLqQi5lHwx3ez31PMIY16hPIUy3mGIMNxBKa0cE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777295313; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zj8hZ7u33nqWt/MVqTENCSDelYZ/mQveeppH4hdN7H0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=QLpQ+h5mqiWmpmaYc4UbEceG0CtZX3jJpkHbwquXfIHQl4ZelXSCSqK/FfA4Xpp3uXnlIxqfqgHRrpRell6jp0axDMChKvNh1TOp2997uBIIts4Y6KKeuSSQ1306v8Fh89CRAkFx0k2ga8GNVhEWDNi8yY19x9grQFN23gr4HvU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XrvWPqMC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XrvWPqMC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F0FFC19425; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777295313; bh=Zj8hZ7u33nqWt/MVqTENCSDelYZ/mQveeppH4hdN7H0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=XrvWPqMCqxm5VmQ/G7JvRjOZ0pTxS0B2T7cuhva6/kiM6eo2MlZG1OXWA2SwBjxHI AP9fIs17Emyal1DHLrPugMLT4XwLsfw8VNs1awLkhR9i8rTGzbaKuOExBVeXZt0DHj e88hH2zU0DQvICu6o3hSnISwB52h7pJvdGCVHJ7i1C8BJdTN8uQx0Lac8OQ8YdneXq WfdAj2/x4AN4PvcGovZmtl7iZQF0FNeg1SoKXbc7o3PmR7TV9peXCZIra40FXRKeea cMp4oa1HT8mbOBL0GDP2v4d+P2hStoo5+4YuhsA3u8ZjrwXqAimSWj4TjILyTZ493W w0tg+xesQM7Gw== Message-ID: <9ee16679-969d-460b-af4a-9ad5a6a1ebcf@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:08:27 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mm/slab: introduce kfree_rcu_nolock() Content-Language: en-US To: "Harry Yoo (Oracle)" , Andrew Morton Cc: Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Roman Gushchin , Hao Li , Alexei Starovoitov , Uladzislau Rezki , "Paul E . McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Josh Triplett , Boqun Feng , Zqiang , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20260416091022.36823-1-harry@kernel.org> <20260416091022.36823-5-harry@kernel.org> From: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" In-Reply-To: <20260416091022.36823-5-harry@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/16/26 11:10, Harry Yoo (Oracle) wrote: > +#ifndef CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED > +void kvfree_call_rcu_head(struct rcu_head *head, void *ptr, bool allow_spin) > +{ > + if (!allow_spin) { > + struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp; > + > + guard(preempt)(); > + > + krcp = this_cpu_ptr(&krc); > + if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)head, &krcp->defer_head)) > + irq_work_queue(&krcp->defer_free); > + return; > + } > + Given "allow_spin" is compile-time constant, it would make more sense to have different functions for each variant rather than calling a common one with the extra param? > if (head) { > kasan_record_aux_stack(ptr); > call_rcu(head, kvfree_rcu_cb);