rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	lkmm@lists.linux.dev, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	aeh@meta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	jhs@mojatatu.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
	Erik Lundgren <elundgren@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] locking/lockdep: Use shazptr to protect the key hashlist
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 07:18:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFwFMf3K_hBygBED@Mac.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625115929.GF1613376@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:11:01PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> 
> > +	/* Need preemption disable for using shazptr. */
> > +	guard(preempt)();
> > +
> > +	/* Protect the list search with shazptr. */
> > +	guard(shazptr)(hash_head);
> 
> OK, this is the end of the series, and so far every single user is doing
> both a preempt and a shazptr guard. Why can't we simplify this and have
> the shazptr guard imply preempt-disable?

You're right. The background story is that in the beginning, the hazard
pointer protection was placed at the callsites of is_dynamic_key(): one
in register_lock_class() and one in lockdep_init_map_type(), and in
register_lock_class() I could use the fact that it's called with irq
disabled to save the preempt-disable.

So given the current users, it makes sense to fold the preempt disabling
into shazptr guard.

Regards,
Boqun

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-25 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25  3:10 [PATCH 0/8] Introduce simple hazard pointers for lockdep Boqun Feng
2025-06-25  3:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] Introduce simple hazard pointers Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 10:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25 14:25   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-06-25 15:05     ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 15:52   ` Waiman Long
2025-06-25 16:09     ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 17:47       ` Waiman Long
2025-06-25  3:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] shazptr: Add refscale test Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 10:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25  3:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] shazptr: Add refscale test for wildcard Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 10:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25  3:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] shazptr: Avoid synchronize_shaptr() busy waiting Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 11:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25 11:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25 13:56   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-25 15:24     ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 13:45       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-06-25  3:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] shazptr: Allow skip self scan in synchronize_shaptr() Boqun Feng
2025-06-25  3:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] rcuscale: Allow rcu_scale_ops::get_gp_seq to be NULL Boqun Feng
2025-06-25  3:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] rcuscale: Add tests for simple hazard pointers Boqun Feng
2025-06-25  3:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] locking/lockdep: Use shazptr to protect the key hashlist Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-25 14:18     ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2025-07-10 14:06   ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-11  2:31     ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-25 12:05 ` [PATCH 0/8] Introduce simple hazard pointers for lockdep Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-25 14:08   ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-26 10:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-26 13:45       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-06-26 15:47       ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-27  2:56         ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-06-25 12:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-06-25 13:21   ` Boqun Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFwFMf3K_hBygBED@Mac.home \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=aeh@meta.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elundgren@meta.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).