From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E09E30B528; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768600569; cv=none; b=EE2lRiVC/GdL+gqvo/GBk9X3/opfGbQbqYDPYFG1ymFVmgme/Q5kazIn6LXPI0zx257vYYmF2X8Av1/MS2DBcrBcqFyfGfo0bWDMk3ELTshuHWlXcC+hp/ERxE7vPDJaOLkED9rS8GfTjukLUNPaK/+ENo/Sd7ADL5941OqbJfs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768600569; c=relaxed/simple; bh=baHuV4XDQ4qytLBVtw2nfc4sXn4sl4nQwTF4CMczjyg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=M40Rcd9bAgCmUXWdWPXB52YHS+i0RCHd7rT1Ooj2f2rACwAhaUKG+EkBLkcznZk8yHWrqn6gN/l0045K6z7XoX9bXEHFsBnbyJaX+93jlI7mMsk1VrGXDMvG8zRLheeH/Lp0M6vD63qrfJ8gRKAV5L0OgCbIgdWaumgx8gKkDUg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=T0P1W73S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T0P1W73S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82D81C19425; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:56:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1768600569; bh=baHuV4XDQ4qytLBVtw2nfc4sXn4sl4nQwTF4CMczjyg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=T0P1W73SVu5jdKSm+lnBSDL6xodZ0YLS0hBsoKLhDsLxBfJQ0Q1qxvFA9p2YrFx+0 DX76t8vJYpEa9NI8qmBgZ/AvNllfnglid8ml92BE7nlzphFpFp0WJCs2bhk33mlGQJ 6uuqS4+bngBDbPUPMUhYuG8Wo0i/vbD2d8Bn/3oGB8dlslyQfnbMkJ84DIxj4LU/rn BIkhPQkyI5sGEr0YUlKPvJu1fNSxD9QhqbsmNHuVaX7HaVirnFzUqWPu5Sl0SB0dAB lbiCkkcltAXj5fto7iZ75NzZ9L1G/V2pokTxx2NU/NwkByKV73gP2bnApz968KnfwH p0efvYBttHJvQ== Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 22:56:05 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E . McKenney" , Boqun Feng , rcu@vger.kernel.org, Neeraj Upadhyay , Josh Triplett , Uladzislau Rezki , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 2/4] rcu/nocb: Add warning if no rcuog wake up attempt happened during overload Message-ID: References: <20260114173154.1701056-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> <20260114173154.1701056-3-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260114173154.1701056-3-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Le Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 12:31:52PM -0500, Joel Fernandes a écrit : > @@ -1254,6 +1262,7 @@ lazy_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc) > continue; > } > rcu_nocb_try_flush_bypass(rdp, jiffies); > + rdp->nocb_gp_handling = true; It should be true already, right? > rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags); > wake_nocb_gp(rdp); > sc->nr_to_scan -= _count; Thanks. -- Frederic Weisbecker SUSE Labs