From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@hotmail.com>,
"rcu@vger.kernel.org" <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
hch <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: rcu stalls during fstests runs for xfs
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 05:27:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXrl46PxeHQSpYbX@shinmob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc611e8e-0da9-4b88-83ef-092d300307e3@paulmck-laptop>
On Jan 28, 2026 / 08:42, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 05:55:01PM +0800, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> > On 1/26/26 19:30, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > > kernel: xfs/for-next, 51aba4ca399, v6.19-rc5+
> > > block device: dm-linear on HDD (non-zoned)
> > > xfs: zoned
> >
> > I had a quick look at the attached logs. Across the different runs, the
> > stall traces consistently show CPUs spending extended time in
> > |mm_get_cid()|along the mm/sched context switch path.
> >
> > This doesn’t seem to indicate an immediate RCU issue by itself, but it
> > raises the question of whether context switch completion can be delayed
> > for unusually long periods under these test configurations.
>
> Thank you all!
>
> Us RCU guys looked at this and it also looks to us that at least one
> part of this issue is that mm_get_cid() is spinning. This is being
> investigated over here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/877bt29cgv.ffs@tglx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/bdfea828-4585-40e8-8835-247c6a8a76b0@linux.ibm.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/87y0lh96xo.ffs@tglx/
Knuwu, Paul and RCU experts, thank you very much. It's good to know that the
similar issue is already under investigation. I hope that a fix gets available
in timely manner.
> I have seen the static-key pattern called out by Dave Chinner when running
> KASAN on large systems. We worked around this by disabling KASAN's use
> of static keys. In case you were running KASAN in these tests.
As to KASAN, yes, I enable it in my test runs. I find three static-keys under
mm/kasan/*. I will think if they can be disabled in my test runs. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-26 11:30 rcu stalls during fstests runs for xfs Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-01-26 23:05 ` Dave Chinner
2026-01-27 1:38 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-01-28 9:55 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-01-28 16:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-29 5:27 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2026-01-29 17:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-29 23:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-01-30 11:16 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-06 9:33 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-02-06 10:02 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-06 11:04 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-02-13 1:26 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-20 19:01 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXrl46PxeHQSpYbX@shinmob \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kunwu.chan@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox