Re: [PATCH nf-next 2/5] ipvs: add resizable hash tables

[Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>]

Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> wrote:
> > There is some checkpatch noise in patch 1:
> > 
> > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> > #42: FILE: include/linux/rculist_bl.h:24:
> > +       rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_bl_first_rcu(h),
> >                 (struct hlist_bl_node *)((unsigned long)n | LIST_BL_LOCKMASK));
> 
> 	I don't change here any alignment and I didn't fixed it
> because I'm not sure how to make it better :)

Thats fine, then just ignore it.
As I said, the checkpatch stuff isn't too imporant.

> > Why are you not re-using rhashtables and instead roll your own?
> > 
> > No requirement, but might make sense to mention the rationale
> > in the commit message.
> 
> 	I found the rhashtable_remove_fast operation slow by using 
> hashing+lookup. Also, IPVS needs to rehash (move) single entry when
> its key changes (cport in ip_vs_conn_fill_cport) and I don't see
> public method in rht for this. Things get complicated when we add double 
> conn hashing, it needs careful move operation from one/two chains. Also, 
> in part 4 of the changes we allow customizations for the load factor,
> in case the defaults are not suitable for the setup.
> 
> 	May be I can add more info in the commit message about this.

Yes, I think your explanation makes sense, a small note/copypaste of
the above into the commit message is enough.

Thanks!