From: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, urezki@gmail.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next-level bug in SRCU implementation of RCU Tasks Trace + PREEMPT_RT
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:20:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab2P61FzyyIN2pib@tardis.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d9e7e42-8667-4880-9708-b81a82443809@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 01:54:22PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> On 3/20/2026 12:57 PM, Boqun Feng wrote:
> >
> >>>> So we really do need to make some variant of call_srcu() that deals
> >>>> with this.
> >>>>
> >>>> We do have some options. First, we could make call_srcu() deal with it
> >>>> directly, or second, we could create something like call_srcu_lockless()
> >>>> or call_srcu_nolock() or whatever that can safely be invoked from any
> >>>> context, including NMI handlers, and that invokes call_srcu() directly
> >>>> when it determines that it is safe to do so. The advantage of the second
> >>>> approach is that it avoids incurring the overhead of checking in the
> >>>> common case.
> >>> Within the RCU scope, I prefer the second option.
> >> Works for me!
> >>
> >> Would you guys like to implement this, or would you prefer that I do so?
> >>
> > I feel I don't have cycles for it soon, I have a big backlog (including
> > making preempt_count 64bit on 64bit x86). But I will send the fix in the
> > current call_srcu() for v7.0 and work with Joel to get into Linus' tree.
>
> Boqun, I get a splat as below with your irq_work patch on rcutorture:
>
Thank you, I fixed that in the new version [1]. Please give it a go.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20260320181400.15909-1-boqun@kernel.org/
Regards,
Boqun
> Maybe the srcu_get_delay call needs:
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup, flags);
> delay = srcu_get_delay(ssp);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup, flags);
>
> can you check?
>
> [ 0.459781] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.460401] WARNING: kernel/rcu/srcutree.c:681 at srcu_get_delay+0xb4/0xd0,
> CPU#0: swapper/0/1
> [ 0.460751] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.460751] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
> 7.0.0-rc3-00020-gc18a9e13ce7f #96 PREEMPTLAZY
> [ 0.460751] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1
> 04/01/2014
> [ 0.460751] RIP: 0010:srcu_get_delay+0xb4/0xd0
> [ 0.460751] Code: 00 00 00 5b 5d 48 39 d0 48 0f 47 c2 e9 45 b0 0b 01 48 89 fd
> be ff ff ff ff 48 8d bb d0 00 00 00 e8 e1 86 0a 01 85 c0 75 0d 90 <0f> 0b 90 48
> 8b 55 40 e9 57 ff ff ff 48 8b 55 40 e9 4e ff ff ff 0f
> [ 0.460751] RSP: 0000:ffffb4ba80003f80 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [ 0.460751] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffac1604c0 RCX: 0000000000000001
> [ 0.460751] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffffffffac160590
> [ 0.460751] RBP: ffffffffac160460 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.460751] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffb4ba80003ff8 R12: 0000000000000023
> [ 0.460751] R13: ffff9de181214b00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.460751] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9de1f2799000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 0.460751] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 0.460751] CR2: ffff9de18ddda000 CR3: 000000000c64e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> [ 0.460751] Call Trace:
> [ 0.460751] <IRQ>
> [ 0.460751] srcu_irq_work+0x11/0x40
> [ 0.460751] irq_work_single+0x42/0x90
> [ 0.460751] irq_work_run_list+0x26/0x40
> [ 0.460751] irq_work_run+0x18/0x30
> [ 0.460751] __sysvec_irq_work+0x30/0x180
> [ 0.460751] sysvec_irq_work+0x6a/0x80
> [ 0.460751] </IRQ>
> [ 0.460751] <TASK>
> [ 0.460751] asm_sysvec_irq_work+0x1a/0x20
> [ 0.460751] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x50
> [ 0.460751] Code: c7 18 53 48 89 f3 48 8b 74 24 10 e8 e6 58 f1 fe 48 89 ef e8
> 2e 92 f1 fe 80 e7 02 74 06 e8 e4 c0 00 ff fb 65 ff 0d fc 63 66 01 <74> 07 5b 5d
> c3 cc cc cc cc e8 7e 03 df fe 5b 5d e9 57 1b 00 00 0f
> [ 0.460751] RSP: 0000:ffffb4ba80013d50 EFLAGS: 00000286
> [ 0.460751] RAX: 0000000000001c8b RBX: 0000000000000297 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.460751] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffffab614c2c
> [ 0.460751] RBP: ffffffffac160578 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
> [ 0.460751] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: fffffffffffffe74
> [ 0.460751] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
> [ 0.460751] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
> [ 0.460751] srcu_gp_start_if_needed+0x354/0x530
> [ 0.460751] __synchronize_srcu+0xcc/0x180
> [ 0.460751] ? __pfx_wakeme_after_rcu+0x10/0x10
> [ 0.460751] ? synchronize_srcu+0x3f/0x170
> [ 0.460751] ? __pfx_rcu_init_tasks_generic+0x10/0x10
> [ 0.460751] rcu_init_tasks_generic+0x104/0x150
> [ 0.460751] do_one_initcall+0x59/0x2e0
> [ 0.460751] ? _printk+0x56/0x70
> [ 0.460751] kernel_init_freeable+0x227/0x440
> [ 0.460751] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> [ 0.460751] kernel_init+0x15/0x1c0
> [ 0.460751] ret_from_fork+0x2ac/0x330
> [ 0.460751] ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> [ 0.460751] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [ 0.460751] </TASK>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 13:34 Next-level bug in SRCU implementation of RCU Tasks Trace + PREEMPT_RT Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-18 10:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 11:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-18 14:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-18 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 16:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-18 16:42 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-18 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-18 16:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 18:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-19 8:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19 10:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-19 10:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-19 10:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-18 15:51 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-18 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-18 20:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-18 20:11 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-18 20:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-18 21:52 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-18 21:55 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-18 22:15 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-18 22:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-18 23:27 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 1:08 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 9:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19 16:27 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 16:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19 16:48 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 16:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-19 17:27 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 18:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-19 20:14 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 20:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-19 20:39 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 15:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-20 15:59 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-20 16:57 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 17:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-20 18:14 ` [PATCH] rcu: Use an intermediate irq_work to start process_srcu() Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 19:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-20 20:47 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-20 20:54 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 21:00 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-20 21:02 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-20 21:06 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 22:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Boqun Feng
2026-03-23 21:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-23 22:18 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-23 22:50 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-24 11:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-24 14:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-24 14:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-03-24 17:36 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-24 18:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-24 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-26 19:12 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-03-21 4:27 ` [PATCH] " Zqiang
2026-03-21 18:15 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-21 10:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-21 17:15 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-21 17:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-21 18:06 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-21 19:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-21 19:45 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-21 20:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-21 20:08 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-22 10:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-22 16:16 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-22 17:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-22 17:31 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-22 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-22 18:17 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-22 19:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-22 20:26 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-23 7:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-20 18:20 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2026-03-20 23:11 ` Next-level bug in SRCU implementation of RCU Tasks Trace + PREEMPT_RT Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-21 3:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-21 17:03 ` [RFC PATCH] rcu-tasks: Avoid using mod_timer() in call_rcu_tasks_generic() Boqun Feng
2026-03-23 15:17 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-23 20:37 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-23 21:50 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-23 22:13 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 16:15 ` Next-level bug in SRCU implementation of RCU Tasks Trace + PREEMPT_RT Boqun Feng
2026-03-20 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-19 17:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-03-19 17:44 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 18:42 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-19 20:20 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 20:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-19 20:45 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-03-19 10:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-19 14:34 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-03-18 23:56 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-19 0:26 ` Zqiang
2026-03-19 1:13 ` Boqun Feng
2026-03-19 2:47 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab2P61FzyyIN2pib@tardis.local \
--to=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox