From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A26C175A9E; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773836155; cv=none; b=fT/iHpOo7FoUdb+V7WlSrcPpHDTwb7iaL+4ea8fmTOnSqh3g8bBFWrWGXFq1JWz6b7FqiMPy47mYWzUAId/XV9XnYPvyrnKNs0isYDQnNFtneYS/q2egTyGKUS3Rc0LcyY3mauKJU50rIefYeSBYHadPdGHZW125adMAobJg1Z4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773836155; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bYZBdXUTwLeQE771mqpLvYrnyV+1W/J73HWKjG4IlKA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BywzjmeDN2iUWctP4yMyRqKT44Bn5ZRkD6vd3q2W1RL2+fp3nH2F3PvA4CSFMY9SEak+kOlX3//VYg1N7XGFuuH1AoqvdJeLbA5stHX/ouLpfPpmXfMo4SG9YIC5cAx9zd5BeiU+q9J6rHK2wExNpTuL+VT5J4g7ItCCe8ZAjNA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gG/DZAOj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gG/DZAOj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A710DC19421; Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:15:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773836155; bh=bYZBdXUTwLeQE771mqpLvYrnyV+1W/J73HWKjG4IlKA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gG/DZAOjL7JYtxLXWxR+ED8rzejgZH7+9Q+PqZg94SVZ1U3CeWn4NeRTORxcomEv5 JHkKbwDhfBt/6+ehjERc0fKxPmAVf7MrMHdVcihrtwSIU+hplDaJeF65vrrWke/fzM 60hCChe3CZA6OYZMdZ5MbvGAseGQCMZaBN/Nqv3+DnpPhVJ/j1gBiX3G3Fd3zuS/LQ dXOUK4cNVZtdvucuQMswM8lfvR9Tivq3t4iik+6Ucn5BhekmF3ON7S4KXa2zSuOl80 addFKoaql57v4s0EitALiAtfsTw6YvVfe8LOHd8tIadc6l0Ix3e9OIi59DKHueDBoj tlq6fHlEMvMgA== Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 13:15:52 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Neeraj Upadhyay , Josh Triplett , Boqun Feng , Uladzislau Rezki , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Zqiang , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , rcu@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v1 10/16] rcu-tasks: Document that RCU Tasks Trace grace periods now imply RCU grace periods Message-ID: References: <20260317212217.1527644-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> <20260317212217.1527644-11-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Le Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 12:04:23PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker a écrit : > Le Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 05:22:11PM -0400, Joel Fernandes a écrit : > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" > > > > Now that RCU Tasks Trace is implemented in terms of SRCU-fast, the fact > > that each SRCU-fast grace period implies at least two RCU grace periods > > two or one? > > AFAIU srcu_readers_active_idx_check() it's only one? But as Paul just told me offline, we flip the idx so it's two. Sorry for the noise. Thanks. -- Frederic Weisbecker SUSE Labs