From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD for srcu's irq_work
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:40:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aob12RahomSmpUQY@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820110008.v2Tlr0_H@linutronix.de>
Le Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 01:00:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior a écrit :
> The irq_work in srcu is used to schedule a delayed work. The work item
> is not scheduled directly because it is not always possible wake a
> thread directly.
>
> On PREEMPT_RT the default irq_work is initialized with IRQ_WORK_LAZY and
> is delayed to the irq_work thread. A system booted with the command line
> "trace_event=…" will freeze during boot because the irq_work thread is
> not yet deployed (and tracing uses synchronize_srcu() in
> tp_rcu_cond_sync()).
>
> The irq_work performs just a wakeup a thread, there is nothing wrong
> with doing this from hardirq context on PREEMPT_RT.
>
> Use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD for srcu's irq_work.
>
> Fixes: 7c405fb3279b3 ("rcu: Use an intermediate irq_work to start process_srcu()")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index 7c2f7cc131f7a..b703233d4a63f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static)
> mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
> atomic_set(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 0);
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ssp->srcu_sup->work, process_srcu);
> - init_irq_work(&ssp->srcu_sup->irq_work, srcu_irq_work);
> + ssp->srcu_sup->irq_work = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(srcu_irq_work);
It may need a comment to not lose that.
> ssp->srcu_sup->sda_is_static = is_static;
> if (!is_static) {
> ssp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data);
> --
> 2.55.0
>
>
Perhaps all irq works queued before the relevant kthread is started should
temporarily be queued as hard?
Thanks.
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 11:00 [PATCH] rcu: Use IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD for srcu's irq_work Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-20 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-08-20 13:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-08-20 17:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-20 22:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aob12RahomSmpUQY@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox