Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rcu@vger.kernel.org" <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mimoja@mimoja.de" <mimoja@mimoja.de>,
	"hewenliang4@huawei.com" <hewenliang4@huawei.com>,
	"hushiyuan@huawei.com" <hushiyuan@huawei.com>,
	"luolongjun@huawei.com" <luolongjun@huawei.com>,
	"hejingxian@huawei.com" <hejingxian@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:46:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b798bcef-d750-ce42-986c-0d11d0bb47b0@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bfb13ed5d565ab09bd794f69a6ef2b1b75e507a.camel@infradead.org>

On 12/17/21 1:11 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 11:48 -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 12/16/21 6:13 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 16:52 -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>>> On baremetal, I haven't seen an issue. This only seems to have a problem
>>>> with Qemu/KVM.
>>>>
>>>> With 191f08997577 I could boot without issues with and without the
>>>> no_parallel_bringup. Only after I applied e78fa57dd642 did the failure happen.
>>>>
>>>> With e78fa57dd642 I could boot 64 vCPUs pretty consistently, but when I
>>>> jumped to 128 vCPUs it failed again. When I moved the series to
>>>> df9726cb7178, then 64 vCPUs also failed pretty consistently.
>>>>
>>>> Strange thing is it is random. Sometimes (rarely) it works on the first
>>>> boot and then sometimes it doesn't, at which point it will reset and
>>>> reboot 3 or 4 times and then make it past the failure and fully boot.
>>>
>>> Hm, some of that is just artifacts of timing, I'm sure. But now I'm
>>> staring at the way that early_setup_idt() can run in parallel on all
>>> CPUs, rewriting bringup_idt_descr and loading it.
>>>
>>> To start with, let's try unlocking the trampoline_lock much later,
>>> after cpu_init_exception_handling() has loaded the real IDT.
>>>
>>> I think we can probably make secondaries load the real IDT early and
>>> never use bringup_idt_descr at all, can't we? But let's see if this
>>> makes it go away, to start with...
>>>
>>
>> This still fails. I ran with -d cpu_reset on the command line and will
>> forward the full log to you. I ran "grep "[ER]IP=" stderr.log | uniq -c"
>> and got:
>>
>>       128 EIP=00000000 EFL=00000000 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=0 SMM=0 HLT=0
>>       128 EIP=0000fff0 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
>> These are before running any of the vCPUs.
>>
>>         1 RIP=ffffffff810705c6 RFL=00000206 [-----P-] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
>> This is where vCPU0 is at the time of the reset. This address tends to
>> be different all the time and so I think it is just where it happens to
>> be when the reset occurs and isn't contributing to the reset.
> 
> I note that one is in native_write_msr() though. I wonder what it's writing?
> 
> Do you have console output (perhaps with earlyprintk=ttyS0) to go with this?

Yes, but it's not really much help...

[    0.146318] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 36K
[    0.249121] smpboot: CPU0: AMD EPYC Processor (family: 0x17, model: 0x1, stepping: 0x2)
[    0.249291] Performance Events: AMD PMU driver.
[    0.249771] ... version:                0
[    0.250170] ... bit width:              48
[    0.250258] ... generic registers:      4
[    0.250662] ... value mask:             0000ffffffffffff
[    0.251258] ... max period:             00007fffffffffff
[    0.251790] ... fixed-purpose events:   0
[    0.252258] ... event mask:             000000000000000f
[    0.252972] rcu: Hierarchical SRCU implementation.
[    0.255797] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[    0.256372] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
SecCoreStartupWithStack(0xFFFCC000, 0x820000)
Register PPI Notify: DCD0BE23-9586-40F4-B643-06522CED4EDE
Install PPI: 8C8CE578-8A3D-4F1C-9935-896185C32DD3
Install PPI: 5473C07A-3DCB-4DCA-BD6F-1E9689E7349A
The 0th FV start address is 0x00000820000, size is 0x000E0000, handle is 0x820000

There's no WARN or PANIC, just a reset. I can look to try and capture some
KVM trace data if that would help. If so, let me know what events you'd
like captured.

> 

>> CPU Reset (CPU 23)
>> EIP=0000fff0 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> 
> This one we suspect. Is this what a triple-fault would look like? Not
> if it's *already* at f000:fff0, surely?

Good question. The APM doesn't really document it. I'll see if I can find
some h/w folks to check with.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> CPU Reset (CPU 23)
> EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 EDX=00800f12
> ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000 EBP=00000000 ESP=00000000
> EIP=0000fff0 EFL=00000002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> ES =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> CS =f000 ffff0000 0000ffff 00009a00
> SS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009200
> DS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> FS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> GS =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00009300
> LDT=0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008200
> TR =0000 00000000 0000ffff 00008300
> GDT=     00000000 0000ffff
> IDT=     00000000 0000ffff
> CR0=00000010 CR2=00000000 CR3=00000000 CR4=00000000
> DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 DR3=0000000000000000
> DR6=00000000ffff0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
> CCS=00000000 CCD=00000000 CCO=DYNAMIC
> EFER=0000000000000000
> FCW=037f FSW=0000 [ST=0] FTW=00 MXCSR=00001f80
> FPR0=0000000000000000 0000 FPR1=0000000000000000 0000
> FPR2=0000000000000000 0000 FPR3=0000000000000000 0000
> FPR4=0000000000000000 0000 FPR5=0000000000000000 0000
> FPR6=0000000000000000 0000 FPR7=0000000000000000 0000
> XMM00=0000000000000000 0000000000000000 XMM01=0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> XMM02=0000000000000000 0000000000000000 XMM03=0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> XMM04=0000000000000000 0000000000000000 XMM05=0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> XMM06=0000000000000000 0000000000000000 XMM07=0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-17 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-15 14:56 [PATCH v3 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64 David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] x86/apic/x2apic: Fix parallel handling of cluster_mask David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] cpu/hotplug: Move idle_thread_get() to <linux/smpboot.h> David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] cpu/hotplug: Add dynamic parallel bringup states before CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] x86/smpboot: Reference count on smpboot_setup_warm_reset_vector() David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] x86/smpboot: Split up native_cpu_up into separate phases and document them David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] x86/smpboot: Support parallel startup of secondary CPUs David Woodhouse
2021-12-16 14:24   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-16 18:24     ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-16 19:00       ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-16 19:20         ` David Woodhouse
2022-01-29 12:04           ` David Woodhouse
2022-01-31 13:59             ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-01 10:25               ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 10:56                 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-01 12:39                   ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-01 12:56                     ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-01 13:02                       ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] x86/smpboot: Send INIT/SIPI/SIPI to secondary CPUs in parallel David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] x86/mtrr: Avoid repeated save of MTRRs on boot-time CPU bringup David Woodhouse
2021-12-15 14:56 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] x86/smpboot: Serialize topology updates for secondary bringup David Woodhouse
2021-12-16 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Parallel CPU bringup for x86_64 Tom Lendacky
2021-12-16 19:24   ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-16 22:52     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-17  0:13       ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-17 10:09         ` Igor Mammedov
2021-12-17 15:40           ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-20 17:10           ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-20 18:54             ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-20 21:29               ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-20 21:47                 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-21 22:25                   ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-21 22:33                     ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-17 17:48         ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-17 19:11           ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-17 19:26             ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-17 20:15               ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-17 19:46             ` Tom Lendacky [this message]
2021-12-17 20:13               ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-17 20:55                 ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-17 22:48                   ` David Woodhouse
2022-01-28  9:54                   ` David Woodhouse
2022-01-28 21:40                     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-28 21:48                       ` David Woodhouse
2022-01-29  9:22                       ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-16 19:52   ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-16 19:55     ` Tom Lendacky
2021-12-16 19:59       ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-27 16:57 ` Paul Menzel
2021-12-28 11:34   ` Paul Menzel
2021-12-28 14:18     ` David Woodhouse
2021-12-29 13:18       ` Paul Menzel
2021-12-29 13:54         ` David Woodhouse
2022-02-14 13:45           ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-21 10:00             ` Mimoja
2022-04-22 21:19               ` Tom Lendacky
2022-06-01  8:30                 ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b798bcef-d750-ce42-986c-0d11d0bb47b0@amd.com \
    --to=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hejingxian@huawei.com \
    --cc=hewenliang4@huawei.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hushiyuan@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luolongjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=mimoja@mimoja.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox