From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: Liu Song <fishland@aliyun.com>,
liu.song11@zte.com.cn, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Use per_cpu_ptr to get the pointer of per_cpu variable
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 22:35:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb788228-9756-2ee9-f11c-eae133c34593@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210701163115.GE4397@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
On 7/1/2021 10:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 08:24:32PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/30/2021 7:38 PM, Liu Song wrote:
>>> From: Liu Song <liu.song11@zte.com.cn>
>>>
>>> In rcu, most codes have used per_cpu_ptr to obtain per_cpu variable
>>> pointers. This patch adjusts a few codes that have not done so.
>>>
>>
>> Minor: Can we also add below statement?
>> "This patch doesn't introduce any functional change."
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liu.song11@zte.com.cn>
>
> Applied with the usual wordsmithing, including adding words to this
> effect, so thank you all! I removed the obsolete chunk that Neeraj
> pointed out as well.
>
> Please take a look and check to see if all is well.
>
Looks good to me
Thanks
Neeraj
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit 9a6b5a10785f4d9b4f073736e6648fa3851882bd
> Author: Liu Song <liu.song11@zte.com.cn>
> Date: Wed Jun 30 22:08:02 2021 +0800
>
> rcu: Use per_cpu_ptr to get the pointer of per_cpu variable
>
> There are a few remaining locations in kernel/rcu that still use
> "&per_cpu()". This commit replaces them with "per_cpu_ptr(&)", and does
> not introduce any functional change..
>
> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Song <liu.song11@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index f9f52daacd1c..806160c44b17 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static void trc_read_check_handler(void *t_in)
> // Allow future IPIs to be sent on CPU and for task.
> // Also order this IPI handler against any later manipulations of
> // the intended task.
> - smp_store_release(&per_cpu(trc_ipi_to_cpu, smp_processor_id()), false); // ^^^
> + smp_store_release(per_cpu_ptr(&trc_ipi_to_cpu, smp_processor_id()), false); // ^^^
> smp_store_release(&texp->trc_ipi_to_cpu, -1); // ^^^
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index a627a200a5ae..f42b98af3ed3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> */
> jtsq = READ_ONCE(jiffies_to_sched_qs);
> ruqp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_urgent_qs, rdp->cpu);
> - rnhqp = &per_cpu(rcu_data.rcu_need_heavy_qs, rdp->cpu);
> + rnhqp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_need_heavy_qs, rdp->cpu);
> if (!READ_ONCE(*rnhqp) &&
> (time_after(jiffies, rcu_state.gp_start + jtsq * 2) ||
> time_after(jiffies, rcu_state.jiffies_resched) ||
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> index a8d0fcf0826f..677ee3d8671b 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(void)
>
> static void print_cpu_stall_fast_no_hz(char *cp, int cpu)
> {
> - struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu);
> + struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
>
> sprintf(cp, "last_accelerate: %04lx/%04lx dyntick_enabled: %d",
> rdp->last_accelerate & 0xffff, jiffies & 0xffff,
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-01 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210630140802.39138-1-fishland@aliyun.com>
2021-06-30 18:57 ` [PATCH] rcu: Use per_cpu_ptr to get the pointer of per_cpu variable Uladzislau Rezki
2021-07-01 14:54 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2021-07-01 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-07-01 17:05 ` Neeraj Upadhyay [this message]
2021-07-01 18:39 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-07-01 19:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-07-01 20:03 ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-01 23:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb788228-9756-2ee9-f11c-eae133c34593@codeaurora.org \
--to=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=fishland@aliyun.com \
--cc=liu.song11@zte.com.cn \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox