From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 315/641] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: validate open interval overlap
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:33:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026030945-tarantula-viewless-6b65@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026030457-shivering-crucial-a99e@gregkh>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 10:04:40AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 08:29:16AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > On 3/4/26 02:01, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to revert this patch in -stable 6.18?
> > >
> > > There is a bug in userspace nftables 1.1.6 that gets amplified by this
> > > patch, resulting in rejecting large interval sets with -stable 6.18.
> >
> > Sasha, I wonder if it might be worth the risk squeezing this revert into
> > 6.18.16 and 6.19.6, as there are various reports coming in about the
> > regression that Pablo mentioned:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221152
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221158
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/9d110d860c0c7e110d018ea53a7666eba275da20.camel@gmail.com/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/2a780701-f1e4-4ff4-b796-889f7ee19ead@crc.id.au/
> >
> > I think I saw a at least two more.
>
> Let's wait for the next cycle, this one is "big enough" as is, I can do
> a "quick" release with just a revert here for this if needed in a few
> days.
Sorry for the delay, now queued up.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260225012348.915798704@linuxfoundation.org>
[not found] ` <20260225012356.353371017@linuxfoundation.org>
[not found] ` <aaeEd8UqYQ33Af7_@chamomile>
2026-03-04 7:29 ` [PATCH 6.18 315/641] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: validate open interval overlap Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-03-04 9:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-09 13:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026030945-tarantula-viewless-6b65@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox