From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05BE28E4 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FA37C34114; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:27:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1655386079; bh=HMhp0mJRTG7zNNs/iEXiJn9LGjkNbXC/ziwq2P/zxvc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=tR+mfsX8FqVRlq/hYI/S6RgsDDFEf7dGe1ORV4vNlfDOElJuAJz2eUTy3u/wOdZSz SjVlQKvKnVTQ461f630DPY+Is8wuTQ+UN6qK8EoFxjaVegPZVh5SOvAeIoOzLxduMf 9TaH9HBd+qetOMRExR5WLegcS+pUeE+OO0AwlzINhAx7wjDnqu1DrXPny6Tu27HbVm /g6UfpGu6IO+qKvJG7i1ILmcX05KtwWMxbW2v2O1I5m13OD3mFaJv6bN0S4HGO+ZFq oHzxBg4LS4bQyb71gYR4fRAcODLfml+hYrn4lP6OZfWXPP+G3Jniw/vrPksgSUGk6c pVggR+FkGamow== Message-ID: <95d92401-3771-137c-9dd2-c3e1ef534f9c@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:27:58 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] connection timeout with routes to VRF Content-Language: en-US To: Jan Luebbe , Robert Shearman , Andy Roulin Cc: Mike Manning , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel References: <6410890e-333d-5f0e-52f2-1041667c80f8@kernel.org> <3d0991cf30d6429e8dd059f7e0d1c54a2200c5a0.camel@lasnet.de> From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: <3d0991cf30d6429e8dd059f7e0d1c54a2200c5a0.camel@lasnet.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/15/22 11:47 AM, Jan Luebbe wrote: > On Sat, 2022-06-11 at 10:44 -0600, David Ahern wrote: >> On 6/11/22 5:14 AM, Jan Luebbe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> TL;DR: We think we have found a regression in the handling of VRF route >>> leaking >>> caused by "net: allow binding socket in a VRF when there's an unbound >>> socket" >>> (3c82a21f4320). >> >> This is the 3rd report in the past few months about this commit. >> >> ... > > Hmm, I've not been able to find other reports. Could you point me to them? March of this year: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220324171930.GA21272@EXT-6P2T573.localdomain/ Andy sent me an email offlist in May; same topic. Hence you are the 3rd in 3 months. ... >> >> Andy Roulin suggested the same fix to the same problem a few weeks back. >> Let's do it along with a test case in fcnl-test.sh which covers all of >> these vrf permutations. > > Thanks! I'd be happy to test any patch in our real setup. as I said, Andy suggested the same fix as you. Feel free to submit as a patch; would be best to get test cases added to the fcnal-test script.