From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B99D1FBC8C for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2025 22:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765146931; cv=none; b=WYF/eqLQdhCLkEKcxBFpyg5NFLkmYyFzCxj7pY+IbCfbWxIlxPRhp7hj7LccbTT/66oH/NPFTY8rkHyBX/9pFO8cOIYaDe+2SJbgohC8aLs+/fwBtG2dPvFKqGIJ03A7M+MAAH2WTjS+ZVSztG2hug5mFUjJ8JyoSi+fvqP/T4A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765146931; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QWkl0kwjBDtREVtvSh0+OJo95vV4EJjMAPJ7sMxTGV4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VwTyVYb2bIaeAWo9yYX1eGJuHmnNpPIEUwmWA3K4lEFGZ5E5ZzYdGD8PTocxF9FhbVsvk6+uZFcj2XAslkgvrwBQaEcwnmwnRHLRqFpwK/522xwLz3TMpBJxOKfReN4ONwSv7Al+m0RREdik80QOhtghNPGGhHe2iYrZJYj+1J4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=UzYhIoGQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="UzYhIoGQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765146930; x=1796682930; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=QWkl0kwjBDtREVtvSh0+OJo95vV4EJjMAPJ7sMxTGV4=; b=UzYhIoGQuy1cgdOB9H5Zv//rGdmFSWbjdz/GSPChDWhqWXEiXzNF/v/9 DnypYTjgdpop64k3hUaC/4u/lhbx6CNw189SFKonulqp64cIWeVspuvDJ lHDWwhd0eGMeVYC4z5imziqNboLuJLskgFDVUPSxZaRmhwmTWSyUM0vgd MbVqMPL+hD9giDFjrLCTQE1NsRTRFtXUL4QqjJXIuJT77pUO8LrHIhC9d 33vM34oEE9kApHle/AhMsipvYfnmEz4Sf5WTocSiREOYskZ4eAypkAxV2 UfrzuMbM9qZuopcHmm7ytLAAMctm4SDTNX+cDTIxk6IVXhFSROU+9O2sz Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: MeC4SdS4TvC29AjZ9lmL1A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: iB8b/GFKTSWE9JV/kGljBg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11635"; a="67141836" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,257,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="67141836" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Dec 2025 14:35:28 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZKmQuc7iQb2yX4tlQzpABQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yAVTPkqEQLivAU8Rru+AQw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,257,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="200258356" Received: from abityuts-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.218]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Dec 2025 14:35:25 -0800 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 00:35:23 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Askar Safin Cc: Dell.Client.Kernel@dell.com, bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, rrangel@chromium.org, superm1@kernel.org, wse@tuxedocomputers.com Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Dell Precision 7780 wakes up on its own from suspend Message-ID: References: <20251207040459.3581966-1-safinaskar@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sun, Dec 07, 2025 at 07:45:28PM +0300, Askar Safin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2025 at 1:18 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > I think nothing. It's better to try to actually fix the non-working scenarios > > rather than remove the feature completely. > > P.S. > > I'm sorry, but why are you so eager to remove something? While in many cases > > removal of (potentially dead or unused) code is considered a good thing, it's > > not always the case. > > Removing code is easier than writing new code. :) > > Speaking of initrd, I tried to understand Linux init code a long time > ago (out of curiosity), > and so I wanted to remove initrd (to help me understand the code). > Also I saw initrd > deprecation notice back in 2020, and I decided to send a patch for its > removal back then. > But I got time for this only now. The initrd support is scheduled to be removed in Jan 2027 IIRC. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko