From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4696997B for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710233437; cv=none; b=OxrJymGGuPA4aK4BDxsY2+Hl0tM0vJYZ5ZbB81K+lXmP4z6RU2y2CKbQgvFvY7YscGAZ11Zu8yfEaFZRdoyIJhD0P2RZD3UXXZQ2ZWN/3zz9Agk4x8zHgJ1l9egGfO3Yqy1kJcaBnLMzrZ6TLyUZpgxwHCw4/bBCt34YB5x7vwE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710233437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GdeE6lcRivj60/3NRRKImzQ+ghFrr2mA897OtI5eU9w=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Er+u12BdHVyrjwxp3W3kzcoTrMX/r/R+3kTn8xyextsc3LZ57cGshfOAWFjE1xh5rlVjmvSmxufOx0aSFMY0GFUP3R7GrSzwuUBbdpahHt+slzMOKc4Nvg7VAs1W3b8pim2zv/4d+Yj6lHW0a+Jr6CzLXrlzAOL2Vk8rL9npkF0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Zf5RqzBC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Zf5RqzBC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710233436; x=1741769436; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GdeE6lcRivj60/3NRRKImzQ+ghFrr2mA897OtI5eU9w=; b=Zf5RqzBCKcy/Xr9MkxaM/FfSJPuU5uhTt8mTt7Gn3ox9s6ho/1F6QGIQ hCFj9gPDmyPbSuaTabO79CDDeSAB+iWWk6hLV9NXnguahfidKCOqWR5n0 m1g4482qNb1TdIR2SC4rXr/ZjEbetycAfFxm/IENyfRD1d3D5JxJcTZl3 PYnEJeZP/fjwFFW9HAwqdv4/qBCV7Kfx7/wayWR50Tk2I8rZT33w0VDZR 1JKoCwVmEZo1D6SpLkDrvxMnswrM7d3LjxktMaWN4GI767QJphCFdULEG YCg9oj7jqxksSVyNCLchP5MMVTNx7NnnwHeAtU1ROt8v3/bAOzZMX1X3W A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11010"; a="4783673" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,118,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="4783673" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Mar 2024 01:50:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11010"; a="937051422" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,118,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="937051422" Received: from mattu-haswell.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.199]) ([10.237.72.199]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2024 01:50:21 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:52:04 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: 6.5.0 broke XHCI URB submissions for count >512 Content-Language: en-US To: Chris Yokum Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux regressions mailing list , stable , linux-usb , Niklas Neronin References: <949223224.833962.1709339266739.JavaMail.zimbra@totalphase.com> <50f3ca53-40e3-41f2-8f7a-7ad07c681eea@leemhuis.info> <2024030246-wife-detoxify-08c0@gregkh> <278587422.841245.1709394906640.JavaMail.zimbra@totalphase.com> <3a560c60-ffa2-a511-98d3-d29ef807b213@linux.intel.com> <717413307.861315.1709596258844.JavaMail.zimbra@totalphase.com> <1525093096.37868.1710176587331.JavaMail.zimbra@totalphase.com> From: Mathias Nyman In-Reply-To: <1525093096.37868.1710176587331.JavaMail.zimbra@totalphase.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11.3.2024 19.03, Chris Yokum wrote: > Hello Mathias, > > Thanks for the help with this! We saw that it's made it into 6.8. Is it possible to get this into 6.6 and 6.7? > Patch is tagged for stable 6.5+. If all goes well it should end up in 6.5 and later stable kernels https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240305132312.955171-2-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com/ Thanks Mathias