Linux kernel regressions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	Malte Starostik <malte@starostik.de>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	basavaraj.natikar@amd.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@hexchain.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: amd_sfh driver causes kernel oops during boot
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:50:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f677a16e-1fa2-3f45-2b44-5acbf67aad3c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b3fd148-44d7-d476-e9e6-f9d8c8ec0ee6@leemhuis.info>


>>>> I have a suspicion on commit 7bcfdab3f0c6 ("HID: amd_sfh: if no sensors
>>>> are enabled, clean up") because the stack trace says that there is a bad
>>>> list_add, which could happen if the object is not correctly initialized.
>>>>
>>>> However, that commit was present in v6.2, so it might not be that one.
>>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken the Z13 doesn't actually have any
>>> sensors connected to SFH.  So I think the suspicion on
>>> 7bcfdab3f0c6 and theory this is triggered by HID init makes
>>> a lot of sense.
>>>
>>> Can you try this patch?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c
>>> b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c
>>> index d9b7b01900b5..fa693a5224c6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c
>>> @@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev
>>> *privdata)
>>>                           devm_kfree(dev, cl_data->report_descr[i]);
>>>                   }
>>>                   dev_warn(dev, "Failed to discover, sensors not enabled
>>> is %d\n", cl_data->is_any_sensor_enabled);
>>> +               cl_data->num_hid_devices = 0;
>>>                   return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>           }
>>>           schedule_delayed_work(&cl_data->work_buffer,
>>> msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_IDLE_LOOP));
>> I applied this to 9e87b63ed37e202c77aa17d4112da6ae0c7c097c now, which was the
>> origin when I started the whole bisection. Clean rebuild, issue still
>> persists.
>>
>> Out of 50 boots, I got:
>>
>> 25 clean
>> 22 Oops as posted by the OP
>> 1 same Oops, followed by a panic
>> 1 lockup [1]
>> 1 hanging with just a blank screen
>>
>> Not sure whether the lockups are related, but [1] mentions modprobe and udev-
>> worker as well and all problems including the blank screen one appear roughly
>> at the same time during boot. As this is before a graphics mode switch, I
>> suspect the last mentioned case may be like [1] while the screen was blanked.
>> To support the timing correlation: the UVC error for the IR cam shown in the
>> photo (normal boot noise) also appears right before the BUG in the non-lockup
>> bad case.
>>
>> I do see the dev_warn in dmesg, so the code path modified in your patch is
>> indeed hit:
>> [   10.897521] pcie_mp2_amd 0000:63:00.7: Failed to discover, sensors not
>> enabled is 1
>> [   10.897533] pcie_mp2_amd: probe of 0000:63:00.7 failed with error -95
>>
>> BR Malte
>>
>> [1] https://photos.app.goo.gl/2FAvQ7DqBsHEF6Bd8

Apologies; for some reason I never got that above reply in my inbox,
some server along the way might have deemed it spam.

Anyways; I just double checked the Z13 I have on my hand.  I don't
have the PCI device for SFH (1022:164a) present on the system.

Can you please double check you are on the latest BIOS?

I'm on the latest release from LVFS, 0.1.57 according to fwupdmgr.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-20 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-23 17:27 amd_sfh driver causes kernel oops during boot Haochen Tong
2023-05-24  3:58 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-05-24  6:10   ` Haochen Tong
2023-05-24 10:10     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-05 11:24       ` Malte Starostik
2023-06-06  2:36         ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-06  6:56           ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-06-06  8:08             ` Benjamin Tissoires
2023-06-06 15:25               ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-06 22:57                 ` Malte Starostik
2023-06-20 13:20                   ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-06-20 18:50                     ` Limonciello, Mario [this message]
2023-06-20 20:03                       ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-21 23:41                         ` Malte Starostik
2023-06-21  2:46                     ` Haochen Tong
2023-07-10 12:16                     ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-06-06  9:53             ` Malte Starostik
2023-06-06  2:39       ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-06-06  3:41         ` Haochen Tong
2023-05-24 10:08 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-07  9:37 ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f677a16e-1fa2-3f45-2b44-5acbf67aad3c@amd.com \
    --to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=basavaraj.natikar@amd.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@hexchain.org \
    --cc=malte@starostik.de \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox