From: butdiene <butdiene@yahoo.com>
To: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiser4 mount options
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:53:42 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14484849.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476EFF85.2070002@namesys.com>
I think this is a success report.
with optimal_io_size=2097152,atom_max_size=0x800, reiser4 runs very
reasonable now. I put very heavy load on the file system. In past, those
operations would definitely hang firefox for minutes, but it's barely
noticeable now.
fstab line:
UUID=1b9fdd32-127f-4751-b6aa-5eb300000000 / reiser4
defaults,iocharset=utf8,optimal_io_size=2097152,atom_max_size=0x800 0 1
cat /proc/mounts:
/dev/root / reiser4
rw,atom_max_size=0x2f238,atom_max_age=0x927c0,atom_min_size=0x100,atom_max_flushers=0x1,cbk_cache_slots=0x10
0 0
/proc/mounts doesn't agree with either fstab or "mount", I don't know why. I
dare not to modify reiser4 source to print out valid settings.
thanks a lot!
output of mount:
/dev/sda3 on / type reiser4
(rw,iocharset=utf8,optimal_io_size=2097152,atom_max_size=0x800)
Edward Shishkin wrote:
>
> butdiene wrote:
>
>>right now, I'm using the following setting. mount options are not the same
as
>>in /proc/mounts, I'm not sure which ones are accepted.
>>
>>but the system seems to be more responsible now. the optimal_io_size was
>>64KB, seems to be too small.
>>
>>I reduced the atom_max_size (from 0x2f238 = 784MB) to 0x800= 8MB.
>>
>>not sure how they would help. I will report later if it really helps.
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>mount|grep sda3;cat /proc/mounts |grep root
>>/dev/sda3 on / type reiser4
>>(rw,iocharset=utf8,tmgr.atom_max_flushers=0,optimal_io_size=2097152,atom_max_size=0x800,atom_max_age=0x600,atom_max_flushers=0)
>>rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
>>/dev/root / reiser4
>>
>>
> atom_max_size=0x2f238,atom_max_age=0x927c0,atom_min_size=0x100,atom_max_flushers=0x1,cbk_cache_slots=0x10
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You have atom_max_size unchanged.
> Please, edit your /etc/fstab and reboot.
>
> Thanks,
> Edward.
>
>>0 0
>>
>>
>>Edward Shishkin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>butdiene wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I run reiser4 on a laptop. I got serious fsync/flush problem.
>>>>
>>>>almost randomly, the hard drive would run busy for minutes to dozens of
>>>>minutes. while the computer is still responsive during this period, but
>>>>firefox would hang until the hard gets idle again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hm.. firefox is fsync-bound app?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I guess I can set mount options to improve the situation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>That hang can have a complex nature.
>>>
>>>Well, try to play with the mount option "tmgr.atom_max_size=N",
>>>where N is atom size in blocks (by default it is total RAM pages / 4).
>>>Look at /proc/mounts to make sure that your changes take effect.
>>>
>>>If it doesn't help, then let me know.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Edward.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Any suggestion is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>-
>>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel"
>>>in
>>>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reiser4-mount-options-tp14476466p14484849.html
Sent from the ReiserFS - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-24 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-23 7:45 reiser4 mount options butdiene
2007-12-23 14:12 ` Edward Shishkin
2007-12-24 0:15 ` butdiene
2007-12-24 0:38 ` Edward Shishkin
2007-12-24 5:53 ` butdiene [this message]
2007-12-24 14:28 ` Edward Shishkin
2007-12-24 17:34 ` Zan Lynx
2007-12-25 4:01 ` butdiene
2007-12-26 0:15 ` butdiene
2007-12-26 14:14 ` butdiene
2007-12-26 20:35 ` Edward Shishkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-19 0:12 Ritesh Raj Sarraf
2005-09-19 0:53 ` michael chang
2005-09-19 14:52 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14484849.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=butdiene@yahoo.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).