From: <doiggl@velocitynet.com.au>
To: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Is it possible to speed up the command fsck.reiser4
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:49:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1949faca7affee8130ee710c63d9e3eb@mail.velocitynet.com.au> (raw)
Hello,
Questions:
Is it possible to speed up the command
#fsck.reiser4 --build-fs /dev/sdX
These days disk capacity is increasing.
There are more cores per cpu.
According to report it took 658 minutes to do
How come it takes a long time to run?
In the future will it be speeded up ?
Thanks Glenn
report at [1]
# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes, 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
***** fsck.reiser4 finished at Sun Jan 29 13:35:04 2012
***** fsck.reiser4 started at Sun Jan 29 02:37:21 2012
[1]
# fsck.reiser4 --build-fs /dev/sdc
*******************************************************************
This is an EXPERIMENTAL version of fsck.reiser4. Read README first.
*******************************************************************
Fscking the /dev/sdc block device.
Will check the consistency of the Reiser4 SuperBlock.
Will build the Reiser4 FileSystem.
Continue?
(Yes/No): yes
***** fsck.reiser4 started at Sun Jan 29 02:37:21 2012
Reiser4 fs was detected on /dev/sdc.
Master super block (16):
magic: ReIsEr4
blksize: 4096
format: 0x0 (format40)
uuid: 3006ced1-7490-4ea8-a9b8-d82143c6bede
label: <none>
Format super block (17):
plugin: format40
description: Disk-format plugin.
version: 0
magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt
mkfs id: 0x1ddaf754
flushes: 0
blocks: 488378640
free blocks: 217146980
root block: 37017218
tail policy: 0x2 (smart)
next oid: 0xedade
file count: 188313
tree height: 6
key policy: LARGE
CHECKING THE STORAGE TREE
Read nodes 197008413
Nodes left in the tree 197008413
Leaves of them 194764277, Twigs of them 2217790
Time interval: Sun Jan 29 02:39:18 2012 - Sun Jan 29 11:20:38 2012
CHECKING EXTENT REGIONS.
Read twigs 2217790
Time interval: Sun Jan 29 11:20:38 2012 - Sun Jan 29 13:30:57 2012
LOOKING FOR UNCONNECTED NODES
FSCK: node.c: 108: repair_node_items_check: Node (43828275), items (0) and
(1): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: node.c: 108: repair_node_items_check: Node (52697435), items (79)
and (80): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: node.c: 108: repair_node_items_check: Node (63227569), items (24)
and (25): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: node.c: 108: repair_node_items_check: Node (63227571), items (73)
and (74): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: node.c: 108: repair_node_items_check: Node (116595727), items (20)
and (21): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: node.c: 108: repair_node_items_check: Node (227923161), items (22)
and (23): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: node.c: 108: repair_node_items_check: Node (284305753), items (61)
and (62): Wrong order of keys.
Read nodes 1481038
Good nodes 471512
Leaves of them 466164, Twigs of them 5348
Time interval: Sun Jan 29 13:31:14 2012 - Sun Jan 29 13:35:04 2012
***** fsck.reiser4 finished at Sun Jan 29 13:35:04 2012
Closing fs...done
FS is consistent.
[2]
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-18 13:49 doiggl [this message]
2013-09-20 8:11 ` Is it possible to speed up the command fsck.reiser4 Mathieu Belanger
2013-09-20 21:07 ` Edward Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1949faca7affee8130ee710c63d9e3eb@mail.velocitynet.com.au \
--to=doiggl@velocitynet.com.au \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).