reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@jeffreymahoney.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfs locking (v2)
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 10:24:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100703092441.GM31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100702131248.GA5324@nowhere>

On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 03:12:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Right.
> 
> 
> The problem is:
> 
> vfs_readdir() {						do_munmap() {
> 	mutex_lock(inode);					read or write(don't know)_lock(mm->mmap_sem)
> 	reiserfs_readdir() {					reiserfs_file_release() {
> 		read_lock(mm->mmap_sem)					mutex_lock(inode);
> 	}							}
> }							}
> 
> 
> 
> I don't think the deadlock can really happen, as we can't release the directory while
> we are reading it. Plus I guess we can't mmap a directory (someone correct me if
> I'm wrong).

Gyah...  For the 1001st time: readdir() is far from being the only thing that
nests mmap_sem inside i_mutex.  In particular, write() does the same thing.

So yes, it *is* a real deadlock, TYVM, with no directories involved.  Open the
same file twice, mmap one fd, close it, then have munmap() hitting i_mutex
in reiserfs_file_release() race with write() through another fd.

Incidentally, reiserfs_file_release() checks in the fastpath look completely
bogus.  Checking i_count?  What the hell is that one about?  And no, these
checks won't stop open() coming between them and grabbing i_mutex, so they
couldn't prevent the deadlock in question anyway.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-03  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-02  9:34 reiserfs locking (v2) Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-07-02 13:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-02 13:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-02 14:34     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-02 14:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-02 13:59   ` Edward Shishkin
2010-07-02 14:03   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-07-03  9:24   ` Al Viro [this message]
2010-07-03  9:43     ` Al Viro
2010-07-04  9:15       ` Al Viro
2010-07-09  3:16         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-09 10:42           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-07-10 13:57             ` Frederic Weisbecker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-07-02  9:49 Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-07-02  9:53 Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100703092441.GM31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jeffm@jeffreymahoney.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).