From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Subject: Re: [RFA] reiserfs 3.6 on SSD software RAID1 with TRIM/DISCARD on SMP-system doable? Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:02:17 +1100 Message-ID: <20130304170217.0f869fa5@notabene.brown> References: <30c9401395b356be4b2cdf42e1afa833@mail.ud03.udmedia.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/EIO7.i.l6n0btJhYud.5OJH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <30c9401395b356be4b2cdf42e1afa833@mail.ud03.udmedia.de> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= Cc: Edward Shishkin , Jeff Mahoney , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/EIO7.i.l6n0btJhYud.5OJH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:29:18 +0100 Dieter N=C3=BCtzel wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I'm on ReiserFS 3.6 since the beginning (under S.u.S.E. :-) even with=20 > beta stuff. > Now it is time for SSDs. > I migrated one UP workstation (openSUSE 12.2 + stable + etc.) and have=20 > to switch all other servers + workstations onto SSDs, too. >=20 > Please give me your advice if I better should switch to ext4 or=20 > whatever. > All systems should run your great MD software RAID1 on SSD hopefully=20 > with TRIM and/or DISCARD. >=20 Sorry, but I am not in a position to recommend one filesystem over another. You might get more opinions if you posted somewhere like linux-raid@vger.kernel.org . > Thanks, > Dieter >=20 > PS @Neil: > I get /dev/md0 (swap) and poorly /dev/md127 (root). > But YaST created this /etc/mdadm.conf on the first workstation: >=20 > DEVICE containers partitions > ARRAY /dev/md0 UUID=3Dbd5xxxxx > ARRAY /dev/md1 UUID=3De74xxxxx >=20 > Ahhh, now I see something (below). > Can we clean this? Sorry, but I don't really understand the question. >=20 > Sonja /home/dieter# cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid1] [raid0] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > md0 : active raid1 sdb1[0] sda1[1] > 1051584 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU] > bitmap: 0/1 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk >=20 > md127 : active raid1 sdb2[0] sda2[2] > 30209920 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU] > bitmap: 1/1 pages [4KB], 65536KB chunk >=20 > unused devices: >=20 > Should I generate partition tables on the devices or are the raw=20 > devices enough? Either works fine. NeilBrown --Sig_/EIO7.i.l6n0btJhYud.5OJH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBUTQ46Tnsnt1WYoG5AQLxPg//QDRqoemkGBwfHiHZTwhwN3N9ZXn4NhBc tQvQKmyVjT47p3fdPkCXxn5RRDNex+zIWyCMzy6Cg1KSV9cOfBva5+2o6LZcKo2J RKVcKW5oKeLXdbOFvm125+jOl9Li+K4kSF18fy8oLjV1t9clQGQ2NstXluqm8kSv 4VKRHJt/eFN+IWYvDvnyJ8e+hGr33A+4BJ/fPzJF3C6pEjt4TuW4MgU0yG1851BC n1MKgnNT3APzF6DbPkmsU9tG1HwRam7rTJ4IIlmSZ+IIkrMqYEtz2xEn1dA26rMa ug4v0wPorhprB1uJKC8yNovHIvApJU78ZMbToViu7x8pXik0R4yX86cLFIfxZfZe eXHeEvk2HLuzyG7inqlmB4Iotmnad9/sIBUNzEtuYS0ig7lMXAPRbhMsQIHiBpSb OkAEfuKJn56Q47TS1loUQusw/v0O3swUiJD7mycZP5odGtEMm2bC4tSH+/dot7AP Htaer2VI+Yx0n0WwlAe50XTxGUGtt6mlsaVtAvOtYSbcecTkRk1gInE0GsfpVoDR kWLiKjX5BaT/KdNy6xPpJbiZ4f5OckeUy9SK3GFXBb+jZHzk8YPE/mOr+EWSz+Vx M49+Jiceke8on7zwKL2172DyOt9i9NqkC2n2pMygPLx9xQeDTRUZcgrvuR2jiqIe 4pwHuarNgjY= =MgGR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/EIO7.i.l6n0btJhYud.5OJH--