reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
To: "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@versity.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 30/31] ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for removes
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:23:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170614172340.18720-1-tahsin@google.com> (raw)

When an extended attribute block is modified, ext4_xattr_hash_entry()
recalculates e_hash for the entry that is pointed by s->here. This is
unnecessary if the modification is to remove an entry.

Currently, if the removed entry is the last one and there are other
entries remaining, hash calculation targets the just erased entry which
has been filled with zeroes and effectively does nothing. If the removed
entry is not the last one and there are more entries, this time it will
recalculate hash on the next entry which is totally unnecessary.

Fix these by moving the decision on when to recalculate hash to
ext4_xattr_set_entry().

Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
---
 fs/ext4/xattr.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
index c9579d220a0c..6c6dce2f874e 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -77,8 +77,9 @@ static void ext4_xattr_block_cache_insert(struct mb_cache *,
 static struct buffer_head *
 ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(struct inode *, struct ext4_xattr_header *,
 			    struct mb_cache_entry **);
-static void ext4_xattr_rehash(struct ext4_xattr_header *,
-			      struct ext4_xattr_entry *);
+static void ext4_xattr_hash_entry(struct ext4_xattr_entry *entry,
+				  void *value_base);
+static void ext4_xattr_rehash(struct ext4_xattr_header *);
 
 static const struct xattr_handler * const ext4_xattr_handler_map[] = {
 	[EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_USER]		     = &ext4_xattr_user_handler,
@@ -1436,7 +1437,8 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_lookup_create(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 
 static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
 				struct ext4_xattr_search *s,
-				handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
+				handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
+				bool is_block)
 {
 	struct ext4_xattr_entry *last;
 	struct ext4_xattr_entry *here = s->here;
@@ -1500,8 +1502,8 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
 		 * attribute block so that a long value does not occupy the
 		 * whole space and prevent futher entries being added.
 		 */
-		if (ext4_has_feature_ea_inode(inode->i_sb) && new_size &&
-		    (s->end - s->base) == i_blocksize(inode) &&
+		if (ext4_has_feature_ea_inode(inode->i_sb) &&
+		    new_size && is_block &&
 		    (min_offs + old_size - new_size) <
 					EXT4_XATTR_BLOCK_RESERVE(inode)) {
 			ret = -ENOSPC;
@@ -1631,6 +1633,13 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
 		}
 		here->e_value_size = cpu_to_le32(i->value_len);
 	}
+
+	if (is_block) {
+		if (s->not_found || i->value)
+			ext4_xattr_hash_entry(here, s->base);
+		ext4_xattr_rehash((struct ext4_xattr_header *)s->base);
+	}
+
 	ret = 0;
 out:
 	iput(old_ea_inode);
@@ -1720,14 +1729,11 @@ ext4_xattr_block_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 			mb_cache_entry_delete(ext4_mb_cache, hash,
 					      bs->bh->b_blocknr);
 			ea_bdebug(bs->bh, "modifying in-place");
-			error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode);
-			if (!error) {
-				if (!IS_LAST_ENTRY(s->first))
-					ext4_xattr_rehash(header(s->base),
-							  s->here);
+			error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode,
+						     true /* is_block */);
+			if (!error)
 				ext4_xattr_block_cache_insert(ext4_mb_cache,
 							      bs->bh);
-			}
 			ext4_xattr_block_csum_set(inode, bs->bh);
 			unlock_buffer(bs->bh);
 			if (error == -EFSCORRUPTED)
@@ -1787,7 +1793,7 @@ ext4_xattr_block_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 		s->end = s->base + sb->s_blocksize;
 	}
 
-	error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode);
+	error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode, true /* is_block */);
 	if (error == -EFSCORRUPTED)
 		goto bad_block;
 	if (error)
@@ -1810,9 +1816,6 @@ ext4_xattr_block_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!IS_LAST_ENTRY(s->first))
-		ext4_xattr_rehash(header(s->base), s->here);
-
 inserted:
 	if (!IS_LAST_ENTRY(s->first)) {
 		new_bh = ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(inode, header(s->base),
@@ -2045,7 +2048,7 @@ int ext4_xattr_ibody_inline_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 
 	if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize == 0)
 		return -ENOSPC;
-	error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode);
+	error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode, false /* is_block */);
 	if (error) {
 		if (error == -ENOSPC &&
 		    ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) {
@@ -2057,7 +2060,8 @@ int ext4_xattr_ibody_inline_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 			error = ext4_xattr_ibody_find(inode, i, is);
 			if (error)
 				return error;
-			error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode);
+			error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode,
+						     false /* is_block */);
 		}
 		if (error)
 			return error;
@@ -2083,7 +2087,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_ibody_set(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
 
 	if (EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize == 0)
 		return -ENOSPC;
-	error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode);
+	error = ext4_xattr_set_entry(i, s, handle, inode, false /* is_block */);
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 	header = IHDR(inode, ext4_raw_inode(&is->iloc));
@@ -2909,8 +2913,8 @@ ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(struct inode *inode,
  *
  * Compute the hash of an extended attribute.
  */
-static inline void ext4_xattr_hash_entry(struct ext4_xattr_header *header,
-					 struct ext4_xattr_entry *entry)
+static void ext4_xattr_hash_entry(struct ext4_xattr_entry *entry,
+				  void *value_base)
 {
 	__u32 hash = 0;
 	char *name = entry->e_name;
@@ -2923,7 +2927,7 @@ static inline void ext4_xattr_hash_entry(struct ext4_xattr_header *header,
 	}
 
 	if (!entry->e_value_inum && entry->e_value_size) {
-		__le32 *value = (__le32 *)((char *)header +
+		__le32 *value = (__le32 *)((char *)value_base +
 			le16_to_cpu(entry->e_value_offs));
 		for (n = (le32_to_cpu(entry->e_value_size) +
 		     EXT4_XATTR_ROUND) >> EXT4_XATTR_PAD_BITS; n; n--) {
@@ -2945,13 +2949,11 @@ static inline void ext4_xattr_hash_entry(struct ext4_xattr_header *header,
  *
  * Re-compute the extended attribute hash value after an entry has changed.
  */
-static void ext4_xattr_rehash(struct ext4_xattr_header *header,
-			      struct ext4_xattr_entry *entry)
+static void ext4_xattr_rehash(struct ext4_xattr_header *header)
 {
 	struct ext4_xattr_entry *here;
 	__u32 hash = 0;
 
-	ext4_xattr_hash_entry(header, entry);
 	here = ENTRY(header+1);
 	while (!IS_LAST_ENTRY(here)) {
 		if (!here->e_hash) {
-- 
2.13.1.508.gb3defc5cc-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2017-06-14 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 17:23 Tahsin Erdogan [this message]
2017-06-15  9:10 ` [PATCH 30/31] ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for removes Jan Kara
2017-06-17  2:04   ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-06-19  8:10     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170614172340.18720-1-tahsin@google.com \
    --to=tahsin@google.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=mfasheh@versity.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).