From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Saveliev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] reiserfs: Add mount counting Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:01:24 +0300 Message-ID: <4756A124.1020905@sun.com> References: <474B4BCF.1000905@suse.com> <47545D0D.6080608@suse.com> <5c7c368b0712031236i33abc7bdtd7a14354c67169b3@mail.gmail.com> <475469B8.4050004@suse.com> <5c7c368b0712031251w75febd3bve5aee70c4935a7c9@mail.gmail.com> <475475E5.1010400@suse.com> <5c7c368b0712031456p120634behc13f2d546df8659b@mail.gmail.com> <47548A90.3060805@suse.com> <475697F3.8050209@emc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <475697F3.8050209@emc.com> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ric Wheeler Cc: Jeff Mahoney , Edward Shishkin , ReiserFS Mailing List Hello Ric Wheeler wrote: > Jeff Mahoney wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Edward Shishkin wrote: >>> On 12/4/07, Jeff Mahoney wrote: >>> Edward Shishkin wrote: >>>>>> On 12/3/07, Jeff Mahoney wrote: >>>>>> Edward Shishkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Jeff. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't object. >>>>>>>>> What does official reservation mean? >>>>>>>>> I can send a request to Hans, but I guess >>>>>>>>> we'll receive his "yes" or "no" with substantial delay.. >>>>>> I just mean that those 12 bytes in the superblock are guaranteed >>>>>> not to >>>>>> be used for something else. Given the pace of reiserfs development, I >>>>>> don't expect this to be a problem as there are 76 more of them. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, I promise to not use them for something else ;) >>> Great. That's the assurance I was looking for. :) >>> >>>>>>> It seems we need something like reiserfsprogs-3.6.20? >>> I actually posted a patch against reiserfsprogs-3.6.20 that reserves the >>> same fields. It also implements the use of those fields. I have an >>> updated version that treats timestamps in the future as suspect and >>> forces a check. I'll post the update later today. >>> >>>> Sorry, I am a bit confused.. >>>> The latest git version of reiserfsprogs is 3.6.19; >>>> The latest website version is also 3.6.19. >>>> At the same time I can google and see that some distros >>>> use reiserfsprogs-3.6.20. >>>> Suse 10.3 uses "reiserfs utility package" 3.6.19-92 >>>> Also I remember that Vladimir worked on some version >>>> of reiserfsprogs not so long ago. >>>> Any ideas about really latest version? >> >> I think Vladimir must have released what he was working on as 3.6.20. >> That's the latest version I downloaded from ftp.namesys.com. >> >> It reorganizes the code into a saner structure as well as cleans up the >> code quite a bit. It also adds the > 8 TB support that I ended up >> grafting onto 3.6.19 for our release. >> >> - -Jeff >> > > We have also been working with & testing a draft of Vladimir's updated > code (not sure how different it is from what you took in). > > Vladimir, did Jeff's drop include all of the changes or part of what you > did with us? > No, I do not think so. I forked that work from 3.6.19 and did not put it anywhere but ftp.namesys.com/pub/tmp Best regards, Vladimir