From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Stroetmann Subject: Re: Formal Reiser4 inclusion and todo list? Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:36:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4C55865E.80905@ontolinux.com> References: <201008011558.01383.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <4C558137.5060306@ontolinux.com> <201008011623.53267.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201008011623.53267.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Volker Armin Hemmann Cc: linux reiserfs-devel Am 01.08.2010 16:23, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > On Sonntag 01 August 2010, you wrote: > >> On 01.08.2010 15:58, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> >>> On Sonntag 01 August 2010, Christian Stroetmann wrote: >>> >>>> We also found out that, like the ReiserFS maintainer, the starter of >>>> this thread, who is also the starter and maintainer of the ReiserFS wiki >>>> as well as the filler of the ReiserFS wiki with copyrighted materials, >>>> has changed to the development of the Btrfs file system, too. For >>>> example in June he made a patch with: >>>> >>>> - tristate "Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format" >>>> - depends on EXPERIMENTAL >>>> + tristate "Btrfs filesystem" >>>> >>>> so that "Btrfs is highly experimental" could be substituted with "Btrfs >>>> is under heavy development". >>>> >>>> Again, this gives something to think about the engagement of the person, >>>> as well. >>>> >>> who is 'we'? >>> And everybody needs a job to put food on the table. Not everybody is >>> freaking rich and working for pleasure. >>> >>> You have a very obvious agenda against Edward - why? >>> >> We only waited for that usual comment, which contains no code, no >> concept, no comment, no consturctive critics, no activities, nada - just >> only stupid and cheap politics, as always. >> So let me quote the actual maintainer: >> "Please, >> don't flood in this mailing list. >> Go away!" >> > hm, one mail from me in weeks vs douzends of mails from you. You attacking > Edward, you acting obnoxious, you talking of yourself in third person. > ??? > Your point of view seems to be very distortet. Maybe you should follow your > own advice. > * plonk *