From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edward Shishkin Subject: Re: Mainline inclusion Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4CBB6F7D.4030000@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=waV7vDeTl7dzkQxOFQbme3IUdEeLv/SFdd2KKca5ydw=; b=q+5Euy+fwfoC9BcbfSqvdt7Km10N4mtOYxyFdCr5NKTFVLddKjSieRgukI6ad44D1C kZTX236TJbtdm64sqhGJwQ/9+sWwRuNN2Nx0lvOZfffDolDkTVtcbCtkjUHO0Ys7rVEe 3AxYTXsIvZsfOU01PES59BM1i2agdRdIuRGuk= In-Reply-To: Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Luciano Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Luciano wrote: > Hi Edward, > Hello. > I've been following the R4 mainline inclusion saga for a while now. > First, congratulations are in order for your developers' perseverance > in maintaining and bug fixing this great fs! But I was wondering where > you stand on mainline inclusion currently? I last read an interview on > Phoronix in early 2009, where you said you were hoping to publish some > plug-in design ideas at USENIX 2010, and then possibly going for > mainline inclusion. However, I believe this didn't happen. Sorry, postponed. Will try to be in time for the 2011 deadline (Jan, 12). > What's the > big picture at the moment? Once we adjust reiser4 to upcoming VFS scalability changes, all the to-do-for-inclusion issues will be resolved. > What can we look forward to in the next > year? > As usual, I can not promise anything. Will try to keep it in working state.. Thanks, Edward.