From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
To: ReiserFS Mailing List <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] reiserfs 3.7
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:05:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE7F1C3.2010701@suse.com> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all -
I recently posted about wanting to extend the maximum supported file
size from the 2 TB limit it currently has to the advertised maximum of 8
TB. This turned out to be a flop since the file system format uses 512
byte blocks in the stat data's sd_blocks field. The format supports
larger file sizes in general, but this field is a stumbling block. Users
are trying to work within reiserfs's advertised limits and discovering
that the limits aren't as accurate as we thought.
I commented during that thread about how I should have created a v3.7
years ago when I first wrote the hack that is extended attributes.
So, I have. See the following posts. The initial version doesn't have
any extended features - it just adds a new magic number and the feature
bitmasks to the superblock. It follows the ext[234] system of feature
bits to define which features are supported on the file system.
I also have fsck support written but it is pretty untested still. Before
I invest more effort in this, I'd like to get a consensus of whether or
not this is desirable feature.
My intention is that, once this is upstream, to backport it to our
earlier products to enable things like the 8 TB limit.
The idea is to be able to convert an existing 3.6 file system to 3.7 ,
just like the 3.5->3.6 conversion. For features like the blocksize
sd_blocks field, fsck --fix-fixable would adjust all the sd_blocks
values on the file system.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkzn8cMACgkQLPWxlyuTD7IbVQCeLzzKRNY6qUrmVFVBDRGoUOCQ
WmQAoJ0oqGcLGfcNSmWxuwoF1du0jUFz
=HlOp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-20 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-20 16:05 Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2010-11-21 11:49 ` [RFC] reiserfs 3.7 Edward Shishkin
2010-11-21 14:53 ` Jeff Mahoney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE7F1C3.2010701@suse.com \
--to=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).