From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edward Shishkin Subject: Re: Reiser4 and mount times Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:30:27 +0100 Message-ID: <4D2C3143.7050008@gmail.com> References: <4D2BE02E.6040207@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yns9f0ewW/De579hN3oHUU6SP0xK63bAuNA/9ULphb8=; b=PivtHXuJvIoYoSqOjkrgnn7UN9snYRR3chVsfLYloCQ2Z4guUnTQEtO1AF30aNWInX qZWZiydyRujzrmt2FzS8erZIlObrJvyk0N+G4ci8vFbiWwRqry+bzeSnmuWnUlDTQRFN bI0FLFBopEeBSJceTIzeerf6di6SJZf/QDqUk= In-Reply-To: <4D2BE02E.6040207@gentoo.org> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Serkan Kaba Cc: ReiserFS Development List On 01/11/2011 05:44 AM, Serkan Kaba wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Compared to other fileystems (including reiserfs) mount times of reiser4 > is *huge* and mounting takes most of my boot time. > > Here's a simple time output of reiser4 and ext4 fs, nearly identical in > size. > > # df- h > /dev/sdb2 428G 339G 89G 80% /film > /dev/sdb4 429G 262G 145G 65% /film2 > > # time mount /film > > real 0m23.238s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.096s > > # time mount /film2 > > real 0m0.069s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.012s > > # mount > /dev/sdb2 on /film type reiser4 (rw,noatime) > /dev/sdb4 on /film2 type ext4 (rw,noatime) > > Can I improve the situation with tweaks, mount -o dont_load_bitmap Thanks, Edward.