From: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@gmail.com>, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiser4progs: possible off-by-one in librepair/twig_scan.c?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 02:12:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A37C52.5050006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1559792.K1g2CRjlCX@intelfx-laptop>
On 06/20/2014 01:18 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> I've got a strange fsck complaint while testing the rewritten discard.
> The fsck log is here (not line-wrapped):
>
> ====LOG====
>
> $ fsck.reiser4 /dev/disk/by-label/linux-build
> *******************************************************************
> This is an EXPERIMENTAL version of fsck.reiser4. Read README first.
> *******************************************************************
>
> Fscking the /dev/disk/by-label/linux-build block device.
> Will check the consistency of the Reiser4 SuperBlock.
> Will check the consistency of the Reiser4 FileSystem.
> Continue?
> (Yes/No): y
> ***** fsck.reiser4 started at Fri Jun 20 02:49:22 2014
> Reiser4 fs was detected on /dev/disk/by-label/linux-build.
> Master super block (16):
> magic: ReIsEr4
> blksize: 4096
> format: 0x0 (format40)
> uuid: 73831051-68e1-4848-b9ea-83f9703558b6
> label: linux-build
>
> Format super block (17):
> plugin: format40
> description: Disk-format plugin.
> version: 0
> magic: ReIsEr40FoRmAt
> mkfs id: 0x143b8ccd
> flushes: 0
> blocks: 2621440
> free blocks: 542951
> root block: 69897
> tail policy: 0x2 (smart)
> next oid: 0x21c6d1
> file count: 182200
> tree height: 4
> key policy: LARGE
>
>
> CHECKING THE STORAGE TREE
> Read nodes 239320
> Nodes left in the tree 239320
> Leaves of them 236133, Twigs of them 3136
> Time interval: Fri Jun 20 02:49:22 2014 - Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014
> CHECKING EXTENT REGIONS.
> FSCK: extent40_repair.c: 96: extent40_check_layout: Node (2618486), item (9), unit (10), [20d7ef:4(FB):766d6c696e757a:20da66:0]: points out of the fs, region [2621239..2621439].
> Read twigs 3136
> Invaid extent pointers 1
> Time interval: Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014 - Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014
> CHECKING THE SEMANTIC TREE
> Found 189973 objects (some could be encountered more then once).
> Time interval: Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014 - Fri Jun 20 02:49:33 2014
> FSCK: repair.c: 550: repair_sem_fini: On-disk used block bitmap and really used block bitmap differ.
> ***** fsck.reiser4 finished at Fri Jun 20 02:49:33 2014
> Closing fs...done
>
> 1 fatal corruptions were detected in FileSystem. Run with --build-fs option to fix them.
>
> ====END LOG====
>
> This seems invalid to me: why a [2621239; 2621439] region would be invalid
> in a filesystem with 2621440 blocks?
> Also, the file in question is intact and does not appear to be corrupted,
> because this is my current vmlinuz. :)
>
> The following patch against reiser4progs shows precise location of this check.
>
> diff --git a/librepair/twig_scan.c b/librepair/twig_scan.c
> index 39b747c..ca8607a 100644
> --- a/librepair/twig_scan.c
> +++ b/librepair/twig_scan.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static errno_t cb_item_region_check(blk_t start, uint64_t count, void *data) {
> /* This must be fixed at the first pass. */
> if (start >= ts->bm_met->total ||
> count > ts->bm_met->total ||
> - start >= ts->bm_met->total - count)
> + start > ts->bm_met->total - count)
> {
> ts->stat.bad_unfm_ptrs++;
> return RE_FATAL;
Sometimes our fsck is overly suspicious ;)
Does this fix help, BTW?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 23:18 reiser4progs: possible off-by-one in librepair/twig_scan.c? Ivan Shapovalov
2014-06-20 0:12 ` Edward Shishkin [this message]
2014-06-20 2:36 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-06-20 7:23 ` doiggl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A37C52.5050006@gmail.com \
--to=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
--cc=intelfx100@gmail.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).