reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@gmail.com>, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiser4progs: possible off-by-one in librepair/twig_scan.c?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 02:12:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A37C52.5050006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1559792.K1g2CRjlCX@intelfx-laptop>


On 06/20/2014 01:18 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> I've got a strange fsck complaint while testing the rewritten discard.
> The fsck log is here (not line-wrapped):
>
> ====LOG====
>
> $ fsck.reiser4 /dev/disk/by-label/linux-build
> *******************************************************************
> This is an EXPERIMENTAL version of fsck.reiser4. Read README first.
> *******************************************************************
>
> Fscking the /dev/disk/by-label/linux-build block device.
> Will check the consistency of the Reiser4 SuperBlock.
> Will check the consistency of the Reiser4 FileSystem.
> Continue?
> (Yes/No): y
> ***** fsck.reiser4 started at Fri Jun 20 02:49:22 2014
> Reiser4 fs was detected on /dev/disk/by-label/linux-build.
> Master super block (16):
> magic:          ReIsEr4
> blksize:        4096
> format:         0x0 (format40)
> uuid:           73831051-68e1-4848-b9ea-83f9703558b6
> label:          linux-build
>   
> Format super block (17):
> plugin:         format40
> description:    Disk-format plugin.
> version:        0
> magic:          ReIsEr40FoRmAt
> mkfs id:        0x143b8ccd
> flushes:        0
> blocks:         2621440
> free blocks:    542951
> root block:     69897
> tail policy:    0x2 (smart)
> next oid:       0x21c6d1
> file count:     182200
> tree height:    4
> key policy:     LARGE
>   
>   
> CHECKING THE STORAGE TREE
>          Read nodes 239320
>          Nodes left in the tree 239320
>                  Leaves of them 236133, Twigs of them 3136
>          Time interval: Fri Jun 20 02:49:22 2014 - Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014
> CHECKING EXTENT REGIONS.
> FSCK: extent40_repair.c: 96: extent40_check_layout: Node (2618486), item (9), unit (10), [20d7ef:4(FB):766d6c696e757a:20da66:0]: points out of the fs, region [2621239..2621439].
>          Read twigs 3136
>          Invaid extent pointers 1
>          Time interval: Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014 - Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014
> CHECKING THE SEMANTIC TREE
>          Found 189973 objects (some could be encountered more then once).
>          Time interval: Fri Jun 20 02:49:29 2014 - Fri Jun 20 02:49:33 2014
> FSCK: repair.c: 550: repair_sem_fini: On-disk used block bitmap and really used block bitmap differ.
> ***** fsck.reiser4 finished at Fri Jun 20 02:49:33 2014
> Closing fs...done
>
> 1 fatal corruptions were detected in FileSystem. Run with --build-fs option to fix them.
>
> ====END LOG====
>
> This seems invalid to me: why a [2621239; 2621439] region would be invalid
> in a filesystem with 2621440 blocks?
> Also, the file in question is intact and does not appear to be corrupted,
> because this is my current vmlinuz. :)
>
> The following patch against reiser4progs shows precise location of this check.
>
> diff --git a/librepair/twig_scan.c b/librepair/twig_scan.c
> index 39b747c..ca8607a 100644
> --- a/librepair/twig_scan.c
> +++ b/librepair/twig_scan.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static errno_t cb_item_region_check(blk_t start, uint64_t count, void *data) {
>   	/* This must be fixed at the first pass. */
>   	if (start >= ts->bm_met->total ||
>   	    count > ts->bm_met->total ||
> -	    start >= ts->bm_met->total - count)
> +	    start > ts->bm_met->total - count)
>   	{
>   		ts->stat.bad_unfm_ptrs++;
>   		return RE_FATAL;

Sometimes our fsck is overly suspicious ;)
Does this fix help, BTW?
Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-20  0:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-19 23:18 reiser4progs: possible off-by-one in librepair/twig_scan.c? Ivan Shapovalov
2014-06-20  0:12 ` Edward Shishkin [this message]
2014-06-20  2:36   ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-06-20  7:23     ` doiggl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53A37C52.5050006@gmail.com \
    --to=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=intelfx100@gmail.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).