From: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@gmail.com>, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiser4: porting to 3.16: any reason ->aio_read() of struct file_operations has been left out?
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:39:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F3E03E.7030805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10671542.MCAVDCHSND@intelfx-laptop>
On 08/20/2014 12:32 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> From `git log` I've seen that VFS people intend to replace ->aio_read() and
> ->aio_write() of struct file_operations with new methods ->read_iter() and
> ->write_iter().
>
> (Along with a couple of related new helpers, differing from previous just in
> calling _iter methods instead of aio_ ones.)
>
> From other filesystems it seems that these are simple drop-in replacements
> (however, well, I have zero familiarity with VFS). So here is a question:
> is there any intentional reason that generic_file_aio_write() is not used
> in reiser4?
Currently reiser4 is a set of two filesystems which differ in methods
of handling regular files. For VFS we provide "dispatchers", which pass
management to appropriate plugin (UNIX_FILE or CRYPTCOMPRESS).
UNIX_FILE plugin doesn't use generic write for performance reasons
(I'll try to find the respective mailing thread). CRYPTCOMPRESS doesn't
use it for compatibility reasons: I don't know how how to rewrite it
gracefully using the generic write method.
Edward.
>
> What follows is a simple patch that I've currently applied to my own kernel
> (seems to be the only significant vfs change affecting filesystems), however,
> I fear that these code-paths are not generally used, so my "works for me"
> isn't really representative. Could you please clarify the situation here?
>
> From 81172835255a01718c2c256942d5887825a0cd7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:33:35 +0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Adjust reiser4 to 3.16: ->{read,write}_iter of struct
> file_operations.
>
> 1. ->aio_{read,write} of struct file_operations are being replaced with ->{read,write}_iter.
> 2. do_sync_{read,write} are being replaced with new_sync_{read,write}.
> 3. generic_file_splice_write is being replaced with iter_file_splice_write.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c | 2 +-
> fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c | 2 +-
> fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c b/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c
> index 8af388d..b0109fb 100644
> --- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c
> +++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c
> @@ -2964,7 +2964,7 @@ ssize_t read_cryptcompress(struct file * file, char __user *buf, size_t size,
> reiser4_exit_context(ctx);
> return result;
> }
> - result = do_sync_read(file, buf, size, off);
> + result = new_sync_read(file, buf, size, off);
>
> context_set_commit_async(ctx);
> reiser4_exit_context(ctx);
> diff --git a/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c b/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c
> index 94029cd..e65c48d 100644
> --- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c
> +++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c
> @@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ ssize_t read_unix_file(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> switch (uf_info->container) {
> case UF_CONTAINER_EXTENTS:
> if (!reiser4_inode_get_flag(inode, REISER4_PART_MIXED)) {
> - result = do_sync_read(file, buf, read_amount, off);
> + result = new_sync_read(file, buf, read_amount, off);
> break;
> }
> case UF_CONTAINER_TAILS:
> diff --git a/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c b/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c
> index 553f1e2..e431e1f 100644
> --- a/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c
> +++ b/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static struct file_operations regular_file_f_ops = {
> .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
> .read = reiser4_read_dispatch,
> .write = reiser4_write_dispatch,
> - .aio_read = generic_file_aio_read,
> + .read_iter = generic_file_read_iter,
> .unlocked_ioctl = reiser4_ioctl_dispatch,
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> .compat_ioctl = reiser4_ioctl_dispatch,
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct file_operations regular_file_f_ops = {
> .release = reiser4_release_dispatch,
> .fsync = reiser4_sync_file_common,
> .splice_read = generic_file_splice_read,
> - .splice_write = generic_file_splice_write
> + .splice_write = iter_file_splice_write
> };
> static struct address_space_operations regular_file_a_ops = {
> .writepage = reiser4_writepage,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-19 22:32 reiser4: porting to 3.16: any reason ->aio_read() of struct file_operations has been left out? Ivan Shapovalov
2014-08-19 23:39 ` Edward Shishkin [this message]
2014-08-20 20:34 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-08-20 22:30 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-08-21 15:05 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-08-21 15:27 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-08-30 16:07 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-08-30 16:22 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-10-09 18:55 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-10-12 9:37 ` Edward Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F3E03E.7030805@gmail.com \
--to=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
--cc=intelfx100@gmail.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).