From: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@gmail.com>
Cc: ReiserFS Development mailing list <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Non-deleted directories (Was Re: reiser4 (ccreg40)...)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:57:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5425C519.1040905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1681022.dqZonnvJOp@intelfx-laptop>
On 09/26/2014 07:27 PM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 at 21:51:53, Edward Shishkin wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 07:16 PM, Edward Shishkin wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2014 11:39 PM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> 3a. I can reproduce the "directory not empty" bug :) Interestingly,
>>>>>> it is
>>>>>> always the same directory under the aforementioned huge hierarchy.
>>>>>> (I've
>>>>>> done the unpack-remove cycle a few times.)
>>>>> I've made a conclusion that this is caused by unexpected disappearing
>>>>> of a record, which represents a directory entry in the directory item
>>>>> (currently directory items are managed by cde ITEM plugin, aka
>>>>> "compound
>>>>> directory entries"). In the error path (ENOENT) the size of the
>>>>> directory is
>>>>> not decremented, which makes the directory undeletable. I still
>>>>> don't know
>>>>> who kills the entries. Special debugging info is needed to find/fix it.
>>>> What kind of information is needed?
>>>
>>> We need to find all places, where the records are created / killed
>>> and insert a hook, which prints such events for the entry which
>>> unexpectedly disappears. This will get us a chance to find the culprit.
>>> I have to say: this is not a big fun...
>>
>> Ughhh, parse_cut (node40.c) is the culprit.
>> If region to cut contains objects with non-unique keys (the case of
>> hash collisions), then this function evaluates the cut mode incorrectly.
>> non-unique keys
> Wow.
> (I wonder, how many else "what the..."-style things are there in reiser4?...)
Currently I don't know open issues, which lead to data corruptions.
There is a number of failed assertions when debug mode is on and
partition is formatted with "create=reg40". Specifically, they appear
in paths of tail conversion. I believe they are false positives, however,
everything is possible..
> So this becomes re-classified as kernel version agnostic bug, right? Then why
> do you see it in 3.16 only?..
Not really. The issue of non-deletable directories is very old.
Now we know that it was caused by non-unique keys (because of
hash collisions). However, having non-unique keys on the partition
is not enough to reproduce this problem: the cut offset should be
between objects with identical keys. Now let's assume that tree
layout depends on the kernel version...
>
>> I think that this bug has been introduced implicitly ~11 years ago
>> after the design change in reiser4 (introducing non-unique keys).
>>
>> I'll provide the fixup later..
> Great. Will be waiting for. /* also, what's with batch discard code and the
> second space allocation patchset? do you have any plans for reviewing it? */
Discard support v8 looks OK, we'll include it to 3.6.X.
As to FITRIM ioctl: I'll try to review it at the end of my vacations
(weekends 11, 12 Oct).
Thanks,
Edward.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 19:00 reiser4 (ccreg40): very slow mount, poor unlink performance, questions about compression modes Ivan Shapovalov
2014-09-10 20:17 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-09-10 21:26 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-09-10 21:39 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-09-11 17:16 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-09-24 19:51 ` Non-deleted directories (Was Re: reiser4 (ccreg40)...) Edward Shishkin
2014-09-26 17:27 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-09-26 19:57 ` Edward Shishkin [this message]
2014-09-26 20:09 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-09-26 20:46 ` Edward Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5425C519.1040905@gmail.com \
--to=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
--cc=intelfx100@gmail.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).