From: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@gmail.com>, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiser4: porting to 3.16: any reason ->aio_read() of struct file_operations has been left out?
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 11:37:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <543A4BD9.9090103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2652463.xKkjd4Oans@intelfx-laptop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2732 bytes --]
On 10/09/2014 08:55 PM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On Thursday 21 August 2014 at 19:05:32, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
>> On Thursday 21 August 2014 at 00:30:45, Edward Shishkin wrote:
>>> On 08/20/2014 10:34 PM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 20 August 2014 at 01:39:42, Edward Shishkin wrote:
>>>>> On 08/20/2014 12:32 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
>>>>>> From `git log` I've seen that VFS people intend to replace ->aio_read() and
>>>>>> ->aio_write() of struct file_operations with new methods ->read_iter() and
>>>>>> ->write_iter().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Along with a couple of related new helpers, differing from previous just in
>>>>>> calling _iter methods instead of aio_ ones.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From other filesystems it seems that these are simple drop-in replacements
>>>>>> (however, well, I have zero familiarity with VFS). So here is a question:
>>>>>> is there any intentional reason that generic_file_aio_write() is not used
>>>>>> in reiser4?
>>>>> Currently reiser4 is a set of two filesystems which differ in methods
>>>>> of handling regular files. For VFS we provide "dispatchers", which pass
>>>>> management to appropriate plugin (UNIX_FILE or CRYPTCOMPRESS).
>>>>>
>>>>> UNIX_FILE plugin doesn't use generic write for performance reasons
>>>>> (I'll try to find the respective mailing thread). CRYPTCOMPRESS doesn't
>>>>> use it for compatibility reasons: I don't know how how to rewrite it
>>>>> gracefully using the generic write method.
>>>>>
>>>>> Edward.
>>>> Thanks for explanation! So, does this patch make any sense?
>>>
>>> I haven't looked at this carefully yet, but likely it is correct.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Edward.
>> Turned out it isn't.. The iter_file_splice_write() requires ->write_iter
>> to be set, or a NULL dereference happens.
>>
>> At first I've thought that we're out of luck and will need to use the fallback
>> splice implementation (default_file_splice_write), but just setting
>> ->write_iter to generic_file_write_iter strangely worked.
>>
>> (By "it works" I mean "splice finishes successfully and does not cause data
>> corruptions").
> ...aand... it doesn't. At least on reg40 (sic, NOT ccreg40):
> 1) `kde-cp` and FF 32.0.3's downloader produce empty files;
> 2) some applications (at least two games: luftrausers and x-plane 10, both
> proprietary) deadlock somewhere inside of generic_file_write_iter().
>
> Removing ".splice_write = iter_file_splice_write" and
> ".write_iter = generic_file_write_iter" fixes the described cases.
Thanks for the observation,
so the final port will look like this (attached)
>
> Unfortunately, no time to dig deeper (MIPT is evil). Hopefully you will
> look into it someday... :)
Yup, sure, study is the first deal.
Thanks,
Edward.
[-- Attachment #2: reiser4-port-for-3.16.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1966 bytes --]
Only in linux-3.15/fs/reiser4/: context.h~
diff -u -r linux-3.15/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c linux-3.16.1/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c
--- linux-3.15/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c 2014-08-24 14:10:36.186139150 +0200
+++ linux-3.16.1/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/cryptcompress.c 2014-09-25 11:43:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -2964,7 +2964,7 @@
reiser4_exit_context(ctx);
return result;
}
- result = do_sync_read(file, buf, size, off);
+ result = new_sync_read(file, buf, size, off);
context_set_commit_async(ctx);
reiser4_exit_context(ctx);
diff -u -r linux-3.15/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c linux-3.16.1/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c
--- linux-3.15/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c 2014-08-24 14:10:36.188139156 +0200
+++ linux-3.16.1/fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c 2014-09-25 11:43:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@
switch (uf_info->container) {
case UF_CONTAINER_EXTENTS:
if (!reiser4_inode_get_flag(inode, REISER4_PART_MIXED)) {
- result = do_sync_read(file, buf, read_amount, off);
+ result = new_sync_read(file, buf, read_amount, off);
break;
}
case UF_CONTAINER_TAILS:
diff -u -r linux-3.15/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c linux-3.16.1/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c
--- linux-3.15/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c 2014-08-24 14:10:36.200139193 +0200
+++ linux-3.16.1/fs/reiser4/plugin/object.c 2014-09-25 11:43:01.000000000 +0200
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
.llseek = generic_file_llseek,
.read = reiser4_read_dispatch,
.write = reiser4_write_dispatch,
- .aio_read = generic_file_aio_read,
+ .read_iter = generic_file_read_iter,
.unlocked_ioctl = reiser4_ioctl_dispatch,
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
.compat_ioctl = reiser4_ioctl_dispatch,
@@ -137,7 +138,6 @@
.release = reiser4_release_dispatch,
.fsync = reiser4_sync_file_common,
.splice_read = generic_file_splice_read,
- .splice_write = generic_file_splice_write
};
static struct address_space_operations regular_file_a_ops = {
.writepage = reiser4_writepage,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-12 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-19 22:32 reiser4: porting to 3.16: any reason ->aio_read() of struct file_operations has been left out? Ivan Shapovalov
2014-08-19 23:39 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-08-20 20:34 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-08-20 22:30 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-08-21 15:05 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-08-21 15:27 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-08-30 16:07 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-08-30 16:22 ` Edward Shishkin
2014-10-09 18:55 ` Ivan Shapovalov
2014-10-12 9:37 ` Edward Shishkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=543A4BD9.9090103@gmail.com \
--to=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
--cc=intelfx100@gmail.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).